DOJ-OGR-00021149.json 3.1 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "102",
  4. "document_number": "59",
  5. "date": "02/28/2023",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page102 of 113\ncount (whether it be Count Four or Six). Accordingly, a new trial on the remaining count would be required.\nFor the Reasons Stated in Points I and II, the Convictions Should Be Vacated and the Indictment Dismissed. For the Reasons Stated in Points III and IV, the Convictions should be Vacated and the Matter Remanded for a New Trial. For the Reasons Stated in Point V, the Court Should Remand To the District Court for Resentencing.\nDated: New York, New York February 28, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,\n/s/Diana Fabi Samson\nARTHUR L. AIDALA\nDIANA FABI SAMSON\nJOHN M. LEVENTHAL\nAIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, PC\nAttorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell\n546 Fifth Avenue, Sixth Floor\nNew York, New York 10036\n212 486-0011\n87\nDOJ-OGR-00021149",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page102 of 113",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "count (whether it be Count Four or Six). Accordingly, a new trial on the remaining count would be required.\nFor the Reasons Stated in Points I and II, the Convictions Should Be Vacated and the Indictment Dismissed. For the Reasons Stated in Points III and IV, the Convictions should be Vacated and the Matter Remanded for a New Trial. For the Reasons Stated in Point V, the Court Should Remand To the District Court for Resentencing.",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "signature",
  29. "content": "/s/Diana Fabi Samson",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "ARTHUR L. AIDALA\nDIANA FABI SAMSON\nJOHN M. LEVENTHAL\nAIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, PC\nAttorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell\n546 Fifth Avenue, Sixth Floor\nNew York, New York 10036\n212 486-0011",
  35. "position": "bottom"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "87",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021149",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Diana Fabi Samson",
  51. "Arthur L. Aidala",
  52. "John M. Leventhal",
  53. "Ghislaine Maxwell"
  54. ],
  55. "organizations": [
  56. "Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, PC"
  57. ],
  58. "locations": [
  59. "New York"
  60. ],
  61. "dates": [
  62. "February 28, 2023"
  63. ],
  64. "reference_numbers": [
  65. "22-1426",
  66. "59",
  67. "3475902",
  68. "DOJ-OGR-00021149"
  69. ]
  70. },
  71. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with one signature block. There are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and legible."
  72. }