mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021244.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "72 of 258",
    "document_number": "77",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 77, 06/29/2023, 3536038, Page72 of 258\nSA-70\nCase 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 70 of 348\ne-mail that I would like to address, and I also would like to address where we are in the case.\nFirst, I wanted to address the comment about jumping the chain of command. After that concern was brought to my attention several months ago, I have tried very hard to be cognizant of the chain of command that If there is a particular instance of violating the chain of command that you would like to discuss, I would be happy to discuss it with you.\n...\nThe statement that I have not respected Alex's position regarding the prosecution of the case demonstrates why you hear the frustration in the tone of my e-mail. For two and a half months I have been asking about what that position is. I have asked for direction on whether to revise the indictment, whether there are other issues that Alex wants addressed prior to deciding, whether there is additional investigation that needs to be done, etc. None of that direction has been forthcoming, so I am left with ... victims, and agents all demanding to know why we aren't presenting an indictment. Perhaps that lack of direction is through no fault of yours, but I have been dealing with a black box, so I do not know to whom I should address my frustration. My recollection of the original meeting with Alex and Jeff is quite different than your summary. In that meeting, I summarized the case and the State Attorney's Office's handling of it. I acknowledged that we needed to do work to collect the evidence establishing a federal nexus, and I noted the time and money that would be required for an investigation. I said that I was willing to invest that time and the FBI was willing to invest the money, but I didn't want to get to the end and then have the Office be intimidated by the high-powered lawyers. I was assured that that would not happen. Now I feel like there is a glass ceiling that prevents me from moving forward while evidence suggests that Epstein is continuing to engage in this criminal behavior. Additionally, the FBI has identified two more victims. If the case is not going to go forward, I think it is unfair to give hope to more girls.\nAs far as promising the FBI that an indictment was a foregone conclusion, I don't know of any case in the Office where an investigation has been opened with the plan NOT to indict. And I have never presented an indictment package that has resulted in a declination. I didn't treat this case any differently. I worked with the agents to gather the evidence, and I prepared an indictment package that I believe establishes probable cause that a series of crimes have been committed. More importantly, I believe there is\n44\nDOJ-OGR-00021244",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 77, 06/29/2023, 3536038, Page72 of 258",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-70",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 70 of 348",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "e-mail that I would like to address, and I also would like to address where we are in the case.\nFirst, I wanted to address the comment about jumping the chain of command. After that concern was brought to my attention several months ago, I have tried very hard to be cognizant of the chain of command that If there is a particular instance of violating the chain of command that you would like to discuss, I would be happy to discuss it with you.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "...",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The statement that I have not respected Alex's position regarding the prosecution of the case demonstrates why you hear the frustration in the tone of my e-mail. For two and a half months I have been asking about what that position is. I have asked for direction on whether to revise the indictment, whether there are other issues that Alex wants addressed prior to deciding, whether there is additional investigation that needs to be done, etc. None of that direction has been forthcoming, so I am left with ... victims, and agents all demanding to know why we aren't presenting an indictment. Perhaps that lack of direction is through no fault of yours, but I have been dealing with a black box, so I do not know to whom I should address my frustration. My recollection of the original meeting with Alex and Jeff is quite different than your summary. In that meeting, I summarized the case and the State Attorney's Office's handling of it. I acknowledged that we needed to do work to collect the evidence establishing a federal nexus, and I noted the time and money that would be required for an investigation. I said that I was willing to invest that time and the FBI was willing to invest the money, but I didn't want to get to the end and then have the Office be intimidated by the high-powered lawyers. I was assured that that would not happen. Now I feel like there is a glass ceiling that prevents me from moving forward while evidence suggests that Epstein is continuing to engage in this criminal behavior. Additionally, the FBI has identified two more victims. If the case is not going to go forward, I think it is unfair to give hope to more girls.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "As far as promising the FBI that an indictment was a foregone conclusion, I don't know of any case in the Office where an investigation has been opened with the plan NOT to indict. And I have never presented an indictment package that has resulted in a declination. I didn't treat this case any differently. I worked with the agents to gather the evidence, and I prepared an indictment package that I believe establishes probable cause that a series of crimes have been committed. More importantly, I believe there is",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "44",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021244",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alex",
      "Jeff",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "FBI",
      "State Attorney's Office"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023",
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 77",
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 204-3",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021244"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document or a legal memo discussing a case involving Epstein. The tone is formal and professional, but there is a sense of frustration and urgency in the language used. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}