mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021573.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "143",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page143 of 217\nSA-397\n28\n1 your Honor. If the Court remembers the record evidence, there\n2 was some evidence of money moving, but it was to buy a\n3 helicopter that was not for her. We heard testimony from Larry\n4 Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for\n5 Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in\n6 the criminal endeavors. I think it's a stretch for the\n7 government to point to that as some sort of evidence of\n8 continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of\n9 the conspiracy. I just wanted to make that one point, your\n10 Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Anything on that, Ms. Moe?\n12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the financial\n13 transaction, we offered that along with other evidence to\n14 refute the claim that the defendant had moved on, which, as we\n15 noted, is an expression that has no legal meaning. And so\n16 contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and\n17 was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence\n18 established that she remained a close associate for many years,\n19 and that is the purpose for which we offered that evidence.\n20 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.\n21 I do want to address -- do you have other -- I want to\n22 ask about 3(b)(1).\n23 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: I think it's for the government. So as I\n25 see the question here, the guidelines require me to find that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021573",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page143 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-397",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "28",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 your Honor. If the Court remembers the record evidence, there\n2 was some evidence of money moving, but it was to buy a\n3 helicopter that was not for her. We heard testimony from Larry\n4 Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for\n5 Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in\n6 the criminal endeavors. I think it's a stretch for the\n7 government to point to that as some sort of evidence of\n8 continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of\n9 the conspiracy. I just wanted to make that one point, your\n10 Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Anything on that, Ms. Moe?\n12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the financial\n13 transaction, we offered that along with other evidence to\n14 refute the claim that the defendant had moved on, which, as we\n15 noted, is an expression that has no legal meaning. And so\n16 contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and\n17 was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence\n18 established that she remained a close associate for many years,\n19 and that is the purpose for which we offered that evidence.\n20 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.\n21 I do want to address -- do you have other -- I want to\n22 ask about 3(b)(1).\n23 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: I think it's for the government. So as I\n25 see the question here, the guidelines require me to find that",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021573",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Larry Visoski",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Ms. Moe",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021573"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}