mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021577.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "147",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page147 of 217\nSA-401\n\nM6SQmax1                    32\n1    already been decided or conceded by the defendant. The court\n2    found they were leader or the defendant didn't contest that, so\n3    the issue was only about whether the criminal activity was\n4    otherwise extensive. So that is not -- that is clear under\n5    Second Circuit law, that they have to supervise another\n6    criminal participant, and it's clear from the guidelines too,\n7    as the government concedes.\n8        Let's just talk a bit about Sarah Kellen. I don't\n9    think it is a fair inference to say from the trial record that\n10   Ms. Maxwell was supervising Sarah Kellen. In fact, the\n11   inference is exactly the opposite. And you can rely on\n12   Carolyn's testimony alone for that; that she herself testified\n13   that there was a clear break between when she says that\n14   Ms. Maxwell was calling her to schedule for massage\n15   appointments versus when Sarah Kellen took over and scheduled\n16   for massage appointments. They did not overlap. There was a\n17   break. That is corroborated by Juan Alessi no less, who said\n18   the same thing. He said Sarah Kellen came at the end of my\n19   employment, to his recollection, and as soon as she got there,\n20   she took over the responsibility of scheduling the massage\n21   appointments. Again, a clear break.\n22       What the record shows is that there was a replacement.\n23   Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell, at least according to the\n24   trial testimony; not that there was some sort of ongoing\n25   supervision by Ms. Maxwell over Sarah Kellen. It couldn't be\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00021577",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page147 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-401",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1                    32",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    already been decided or conceded by the defendant. The court\n2    found they were leader or the defendant didn't contest that, so\n3    the issue was only about whether the criminal activity was\n4    otherwise extensive. So that is not -- that is clear under\n5    Second Circuit law, that they have to supervise another\n6    criminal participant, and it's clear from the guidelines too,\n7    as the government concedes.\n8        Let's just talk a bit about Sarah Kellen. I don't\n9    think it is a fair inference to say from the trial record that\n10   Ms. Maxwell was supervising Sarah Kellen. In fact, the\n11   inference is exactly the opposite. And you can rely on\n12   Carolyn's testimony alone for that; that she herself testified\n13   that there was a clear break between when she says that\n14   Ms. Maxwell was calling her to schedule for massage\n15   appointments versus when Sarah Kellen took over and scheduled\n16   for massage appointments. They did not overlap. There was a\n17   break. That is corroborated by Juan Alessi no less, who said\n18   the same thing. He said Sarah Kellen came at the end of my\n19   employment, to his recollection, and as soon as she got there,\n20   she took over the responsibility of scheduling the massage\n21   appointments. Again, a clear break.\n22       What the record shows is that there was a replacement.\n23   Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell, at least according to the\n24   trial testimony; not that there was some sort of ongoing\n25   supervision by Ms. Maxwell over Sarah Kellen. It couldn't be",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021577",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Sarah Kellen",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Carolyn",
      "Juan Alessi"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021577"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}