mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021588.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "158",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page158 of 217\nSA-412\n\nM6SQmax1\n43\n1    was extensive. Whether criminal activity is extensive is based\n2    primarily on the number of people involved, criminally and\n3    noncriminally, rather than on other possible indicators of the\n4    extensiveness of the activity. District courts must determine\n5    the number of knowing participants in the criminal activity,\n6    the number of unknowing participants whose activities were\n7    organized or led by the defendant with specific criminal\n8    intent, and the extent to which the services of the unknowing\n9    participants were peculiar and necessary to the criminal\n10   scheme. For example, a taxi driver that drives a defendant to\n11   a crime scene would not count. That is an example from a case\n12   called Carrozella, 105 F.3d at 804.\n13   At all relevant times, the conspiracy proved at trial\n14   included at least two knowing participants: Epstein and the\n15   defendant. Beginning in 2002, Sarah Kellen joined, and\n16   beginning in approximately 2001, additional minor victims were\n17   recruited through Virginia and Carolyn. Additionally, trial\n18   evidence established that services were unknowingly provided by\n19   various Epstein employees. For example, I credit Juan Alessl's\n20   testimony that following the defendant's instructions, he\n21   scheduled massage appointments, set up the massage table for\n22   appointments, cleaned up after sexualized massages, and on at\n23   least one occasion drove Virginia to an appointment.\n24   Additionally, both Visoski and Rodgers were employed\n25   as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C...\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021588",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page158 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-412",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1\n43\n1    was extensive. Whether criminal activity is extensive is based\n2    primarily on the number of people involved, criminally and\n3    noncriminally, rather than on other possible indicators of the\n4    extensiveness of the activity. District courts must determine\n5    the number of knowing participants in the criminal activity,\n6    the number of unknowing participants whose activities were\n7    organized or led by the defendant with specific criminal\n8    intent, and the extent to which the services of the unknowing\n9    participants were peculiar and necessary to the criminal\n10   scheme. For example, a taxi driver that drives a defendant to\n11   a crime scene would not count. That is an example from a case\n12   called Carrozella, 105 F.3d at 804.\n13   At all relevant times, the conspiracy proved at trial\n14   included at least two knowing participants: Epstein and the\n15   defendant. Beginning in 2002, Sarah Kellen joined, and\n16   beginning in approximately 2001, additional minor victims were\n17   recruited through Virginia and Carolyn. Additionally, trial\n18   evidence established that services were unknowingly provided by\n19   various Epstein employees. For example, I credit Juan Alessl's\n20   testimony that following the defendant's instructions, he\n21   scheduled massage appointments, set up the massage table for\n22   appointments, cleaned up after sexualized massages, and on at\n23   least one occasion drove Virginia to an appointment.\n24   Additionally, both Visoski and Rodgers were employed\n25   as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C...\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021588",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Sarah Kellen",
      "Virginia",
      "Carolyn",
      "Juan Alessi",
      "Visoski",
      "Rodgers"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2002",
      "2001",
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021588"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Epstein. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name of the reporting company and a phone number."
}