mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021589.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "159",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page159 of 217\n\nM6SQmax1                    44\n1    conviction. Visoski testified that Maxwell partially owned the\n2    jet, and both pilots testified that she would tell them when to\n3    fly Epstein or schedule flights for herself. The evidence at\n4    trial demonstrates that Epstein and the defendant had the\n5    pilots fly victims of the conspiracy. Across the timeframe of\n6    all counts of conviction, Alessi, Visoski and Rodgers provided\n7    personalized services that were peculiarly tailored to the\n8    defendant's offenses and were not fungible services generally\n9    available to the public. Again, I'm citing from the Carrozzella\n10   case, 105 F.3d at 804.\n11        In addition to these unknowing participants that testified at\n12   trial, I find by a preponderance of the evidence that there were\n13   other unknowing persons led by Maxwell. As Epstein's number one,\n14   Ms. Maxwell managed Epstein's numerous households and interviewed,\n15   hired and oversaw the household staff. The defendant had her own\n16   personal assistants, like Sarah Kellen and another individual.\n17   From the record, I can't determine the precise number of these\n18   other individuals that unknowingly assisted Epstein and the\n19   defendant in their criminal activity, but I find an adequate basis\n20   in the record that the number is sufficient to make the activity\n21   extensive within the meaning of 3B1.1(a) from 1994 to 2004. See\n22   United States v. Archer, 671 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2011).\n23        Last, the defendant objects to enhancement 2G1.1(b)(4)(B).\n24   That provision increases the offense level by\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00021589",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page159 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1                    44\n1    conviction. Visoski testified that Maxwell partially owned the\n2    jet, and both pilots testified that she would tell them when to\n3    fly Epstein or schedule flights for herself. The evidence at\n4    trial demonstrates that Epstein and the defendant had the\n5    pilots fly victims of the conspiracy. Across the timeframe of\n6    all counts of conviction, Alessi, Visoski and Rodgers provided\n7    personalized services that were peculiarly tailored to the\n8    defendant's offenses and were not fungible services generally\n9    available to the public. Again, I'm citing from the Carrozzella\n10   case, 105 F.3d at 804.\n11        In addition to these unknowing participants that testified at\n12   trial, I find by a preponderance of the evidence that there were\n13   other unknowing persons led by Maxwell. As Epstein's number one,\n14   Ms. Maxwell managed Epstein's numerous households and interviewed,\n15   hired and oversaw the household staff. The defendant had her own\n16   personal assistants, like Sarah Kellen and another individual.\n17   From the record, I can't determine the precise number of these\n18   other individuals that unknowingly assisted Epstein and the\n19   defendant in their criminal activity, but I find an adequate basis\n20   in the record that the number is sufficient to make the activity\n21   extensive within the meaning of 3B1.1(a) from 1994 to 2004. See\n22   United States v. Archer, 671 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2011).\n23        Last, the defendant objects to enhancement 2G1.1(b)(4)(B).\n24   That provision increases the offense level by\n25",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021589",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Visoski",
      "Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Alessi",
      "Rodgers",
      "Carrozzella",
      "Sarah Kellen",
      "Archer"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023",
      "1994",
      "2004"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "78",
      "3536039",
      "159",
      "217",
      "105 F.3d",
      "804",
      "671 F.3d 149",
      "2d Cir. 2011",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021589"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of United States v. Maxwell. The text is typed, and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes references to other court cases and legal codes."
}