mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021599.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "169",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page169 of 217\nSA-423\n\nM6SQmax1                    54\n1 assets, and then reported $22 million in assets in support of\n2 the December 2020 bail application. The claim now of an\n3 inability to pay the fine, as I understand it, at the same time\n4 in which the defense has not provided documentation of her\n5 marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement. So I am\n6 unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is\n7 indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine.\n8         I will address restitution at the end. I understand\n9 the government is not seeking restitution. So we will pick\n10 that up at the end.\n11         All right. With that, I'm going to take a break, and\n12 then I will come back and hear from -- just fill a few\n13 formalities. Neither of the papers make an argument for formal\n14 downward departures, as I understood them. In any event, I've\n15 considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure\n16 from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not\n17 find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines.\n18         When we return with the Guideline calculation\n19 complete, I will hear from the parties as to what they contend\n20 a reasonable sentence is for Ms. Maxwell, taking into account\n21 the 3553(a) factors.\n22         It's 12:30, which is a shocking fact to me. I suppose\n23 we should take a 30-minute break so that everyone can get\n24 lunch, as I imagine we still have a fair amount of matters to\n25 discuss and time to get through. So we'll take a 30-minute\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021599",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page169 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-423",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1                    54\n1 assets, and then reported $22 million in assets in support of\n2 the December 2020 bail application. The claim now of an\n3 inability to pay the fine, as I understand it, at the same time\n4 in which the defense has not provided documentation of her\n5 marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement. So I am\n6 unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is\n7 indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine.\n8         I will address restitution at the end. I understand\n9 the government is not seeking restitution. So we will pick\n10 that up at the end.\n11         All right. With that, I'm going to take a break, and\n12 then I will come back and hear from -- just fill a few\n13 formalities. Neither of the papers make an argument for formal\n14 downward departures, as I understood them. In any event, I've\n15 considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure\n16 from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not\n17 find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines.\n18         When we return with the Guideline calculation\n19 complete, I will hear from the parties as to what they contend\n20 a reasonable sentence is for Ms. Maxwell, taking into account\n21 the 3553(a) factors.\n22         It's 12:30, which is a shocking fact to me. I suppose\n23 we should take a 30-minute break so that everyone can get\n24 lunch, as I imagine we still have a fair amount of matters to\n25 discuss and time to get through. So we'll take a 30-minute",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021599",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "December 2020",
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021599"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}