mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021640.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "210 of 217",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page210 of 217\nSA-464\n\nM6s2Max2 95\n1 unfounded and exaggerated and that Ms. Maxwell's treatment at\n2 MDC was overall as good as or better than that of the typical\n3 pretrial detainee at the MDC during the pandemic.\n4 I also reject the repeated allegations that\n5 Ms. Maxwell, who was provided extensive access to computers and\n6 legal materials, as well as to highly involved counsel, was in\n7 any way not able to prepare for trial or sentencing. I will\n8 say that I think a lack of full candor regarding treatment is\n9 consistent with a lack of candor to Pretrial Services and to\n10 the Court regarding finances, as well as the dishonesty that I\n11 have concluded occurred during the civil deposition that makes\n12 up the perjury counts. Overall, the behaviour appears\n13 consistent with a pattern of deflection of blame.\n14 I will note that I was -- I would emphasize that the\n15 sentencing submission talks about these complaints and blames\n16 others but did not express remorse or acceptance of\n17 responsibility. Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Maxwell today\n18 acknowledge the courage of the victims who testified and who\n19 spoke, talked about the pain and anguish that they have\n20 expressed, to some extent acknowledged the impact on them and\n21 their suffering, and I think that is important for the victims\n22 to hear. What there wasn't expressed was acceptance of\n23 responsibility. Now let me be clear. Ms. Maxwell is fully\n24 entitled to exercise her constitutional -- was fully entitled\n25 and is fully entitled to exercise her constitutional right to\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021640",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page210 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-464",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6s2Max2 95",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 unfounded and exaggerated and that Ms. Maxwell's treatment at\n2 MDC was overall as good as or better than that of the typical\n3 pretrial detainee at the MDC during the pandemic.\n4 I also reject the repeated allegations that\n5 Ms. Maxwell, who was provided extensive access to computers and\n6 legal materials, as well as to highly involved counsel, was in\n7 any way not able to prepare for trial or sentencing. I will\n8 say that I think a lack of full candor regarding treatment is\n9 consistent with a lack of candor to Pretrial Services and to\n10 the Court regarding finances, as well as the dishonesty that I\n11 have concluded occurred during the civil deposition that makes\n12 up the perjury counts. Overall, the behaviour appears\n13 consistent with a pattern of deflection of blame.\n14 I will note that I was -- I would emphasize that the\n15 sentencing submission talks about these complaints and blames\n16 others but did not express remorse or acceptance of\n17 responsibility. Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Maxwell today\n18 acknowledge the courage of the victims who testified and who\n19 spoke, talked about the pain and anguish that they have\n20 expressed, to some extent acknowledged the impact on them and\n21 their suffering, and I think that is important for the victims\n22 to hear. What there wasn't expressed was acceptance of\n23 responsibility. Now let me be clear. Ms. Maxwell is fully\n24 entitled to exercise her constitutional -- was fully entitled\n25 and is fully entitled to exercise her constitutional right to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021640",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MDC",
      "Pretrial Services",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "SA-464",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021640"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or report. The text is clear and legible. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}