mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021673.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "26",
    "document_number": "79",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page26 of 93\n13\nOn June 29, 2022, Judge Nathan sentenced Maxwell to 60 months' imprisonment on Count Three, 120 months' imprisonment on Count Four, and 240 months' imprisonment on Count Six, all to run concurrently, to be followed by five years' supervised release, and imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special assessment.\n\nARGUMENT\nPOINT I\nThe District Court Correctly Concluded That Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Does Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution in the Southern District of New York\nIn 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues that this agreement, which neither she nor the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York signed, nevertheless bars her prosecution in the Southern District of New York in this case, and she twice sought dismissal of the charges in the Indictment on that ground. The District Court denied the motions to dismiss, correctly recognizing that Maxwell's argument is precluded by the text of the agreement and this Court's longstanding precedent. Accordingly, this Court should affirm the denial of the motions to dismiss.\n\nDOJ-OGR-00021673",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page26 of 93",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On June 29, 2022, Judge Nathan sentenced Maxwell to 60 months' imprisonment on Count Three, 120 months' imprisonment on Count Four, and 240 months' imprisonment on Count Six, all to run concurrently, to be followed by five years' supervised release, and imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special assessment.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ARGUMENT\nPOINT I\nThe District Court Correctly Concluded That Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Does Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution in the Southern District of New York",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues that this agreement, which neither she nor the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York signed, nevertheless bars her prosecution in the Southern District of New York in this case, and she twice sought dismissal of the charges in the Indictment on that ground. The District Court denied the motions to dismiss, correctly recognizing that Maxwell's argument is precluded by the text of the agreement and this Court's longstanding precedent. Accordingly, this Court should affirm the denial of the motions to dismiss.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021673",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Judge Nathan",
      "Maxwell",
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "U.S. Attorney's Office"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District of New York",
      "Southern District of Florida"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "June 29, 2022",
      "2007",
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "79",
      "3536060",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021673"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Maxwell, discussing her sentencing and the relevance of a non-prosecution agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein."
}