DOJ-OGR-00022064.json 6.9 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "35",
  5. "date": "04/24/20",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 34\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\nSTATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Indictment................................................................................................................ 2\nII. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant's Request for Additional Materials .................... 3\nA. The Government's Discovery Production ................................................................ 3\nB. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials............................................ 4\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 7\nI. Applicable Law .............................................................................................................. 7\nA. Brady & Giglio ........................................................................................................ 7\nB. Rule 16.................................................................................................................... 8\nII. Thomas is Not Entitled to Additional Materials ............................................................ 8\nA. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations ............... 8\nB. The Requested Records Are Not \"Material\" to Preparing a Defense and Are Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification ............................... 10\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 10\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 12\nC. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team ................................................................. 15\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 16\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 19\nD. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure.......................... 21\nE. Thomas Has Not Carried His Burden With Respect to Discovery of Material in Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim ............................................................... 24\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 24\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 26\nCONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 29\n\nDOJ-OGR-00022064",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 34",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\nSTATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Indictment................................................................................................................ 2\nII. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant's Request for Additional Materials .................... 3\nA. The Government's Discovery Production ................................................................ 3\nB. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials............................................ 4\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 7\nI. Applicable Law .............................................................................................................. 7\nA. Brady & Giglio ........................................................................................................ 7\nB. Rule 16.................................................................................................................... 8\nII. Thomas is Not Entitled to Additional Materials ............................................................ 8\nA. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations ............... 8\nB. The Requested Records Are Not \"Material\" to Preparing a Defense and Are Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification ............................... 10\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 10\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 12\nC. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team ................................................................. 15\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 16\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 19\nD. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure.......................... 21\nE. Thomas Has Not Carried His Burden With Respect to Discovery of Material in Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim ............................................................... 24\n1. Applicable Law ................................................................................................ 24\n2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 26\nCONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 29",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00022064",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Thomas"
  36. ],
  37. "organizations": [
  38. "DOJ"
  39. ],
  40. "locations": [],
  41. "dates": [
  42. "04/24/20"
  43. ],
  44. "reference_numbers": [
  45. "1:19-cr-00830-AT",
  46. "Document 35",
  47. "DOJ-OGR-00022064"
  48. ]
  49. },
  50. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document contains legal arguments and discussions related to discovery and disclosure obligations."
  51. }