DOJ-OGR-00000330.json 8.8 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "11",
  5. "date": "July 12, 2019",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14\n\nHonorable Richard M. Berman\nUnited States District Judge\nJuly 12, 2019\nPage 2\n\nlaw, seeks to diminish and demean the harm caused to the many victims of the defendant's appalling sexual abuse, and utterly fails to meet its burden of rebutting the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community. Rather than even attempting to address the grave risks of releasing a defendant with extraordinary financial resources and a history of abusing minors, the defendant instead proposes a bail package that amounts to little more than a barely-secured bond masquerading as a 14-point plan. The Court should reject the defendant's application and order him detained pending trial.\n\nAmong other things, the proposed bail package contemplates the defendant pledging as the principal security a property that has already been identified by the Government as subject to forfeiture upon the defendant's conviction, and which therefore is of no value as collateral. His proposed global waiver of extradition is unenforceable, and even if enforceable would be little comfort to victims forced to wait additional years while the defendant is located and returned to this country. The promise to \"deregister or otherwise ground\" his private jet is meaningless given his wealth and ability to easily secure other means of travel. The two co-signers he proposes only further highlight his minimal community ties, including his lack of any family in or near the District. Electronic monitoring would merely give the defendant less of a head start in fleeing—and does not guard against the risk of him endangering victims in the very home where he has continued to hoard nude images of young women and girls. And the private security force he proposes to guard his gilded cage, a proposal already rejected by this Court in similar circumstances, simply reinforces the obvious fact that the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center.\n\nThe defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant or reasonably protect the community from the dangers he poses if released, the Court should order him detained.\n\nBACKGROUND\n\nAs previously set forth, a federal grand jury in this District returned an indictment (the \"Indictment\") charging the defendant with violating Title 18, United States Code Section 1519, and conspiracy to commit the same.\n\nAs charged by the grand jury, the facts giving rise to those counts involve a years-long scheme to sexually abuse underage girls. Specifically, the defendant enticed and recruited dozens of minor girls to engage in sex acts with him, for which he paid the victims hundreds of dollars in cash, in at least two different states. Victims were initially recruited to provide \"massages\" to the defendant, which would be performed nude or partially nude, would become increasingly sexual in nature, and would typically include one or more sex acts, including groping and direct or indirect contact with victims' genitals. To perpetuate this exploitation of underage girls, the defendant actively encouraged certain victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly sexually abused. He paid these victim-recruiters hundreds of dollars for each additional girl they brought to him, creating a network of underage victims for him to exploit in New York and Palm Beach.\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000330",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Honorable Richard M. Berman\nUnited States District Judge\nJuly 12, 2019\nPage 2",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "law, seeks to diminish and demean the harm caused to the many victims of the defendant's appalling sexual abuse, and utterly fails to meet its burden of rebutting the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community. Rather than even attempting to address the grave risks of releasing a defendant with extraordinary financial resources and a history of abusing minors, the defendant instead proposes a bail package that amounts to little more than a barely-secured bond masquerading as a 14-point plan. The Court should reject the defendant's application and order him detained pending trial.",
  25. "position": "main body"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Among other things, the proposed bail package contemplates the defendant pledging as the principal security a property that has already been identified by the Government as subject to forfeiture upon the defendant's conviction, and which therefore is of no value as collateral. His proposed global waiver of extradition is unenforceable, and even if enforceable would be little comfort to victims forced to wait additional years while the defendant is located and returned to this country. The promise to \"deregister or otherwise ground\" his private jet is meaningless given his wealth and ability to easily secure other means of travel. The two co-signers he proposes only further highlight his minimal community ties, including his lack of any family in or near the District. Electronic monitoring would merely give the defendant less of a head start in fleeing—and does not guard against the risk of him endangering victims in the very home where he has continued to hoard nude images of young women and girls. And the private security force he proposes to guard his gilded cage, a proposal already rejected by this Court in similar circumstances, simply reinforces the obvious fact that the defendant should be housed where he can be secured at all times: a federal correctional center.",
  30. "position": "main body"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "The defendant faces a presumption of detention, Pretrial Services has recommended detention, and victims of the defendant seek his detention. Because there are no set of conditions short of incarceration that can reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant or reasonably protect the community from the dangers he poses if released, the Court should order him detained.",
  35. "position": "main body"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "BACKGROUND",
  40. "position": "header"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "As previously set forth, a federal grand jury in this District returned an indictment (the \"Indictment\") charging the defendant with violating Title 18, United States Code Section 1519, and conspiracy to commit the same.",
  45. "position": "main body"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "As charged by the grand jury, the facts giving rise to those counts involve a years-long scheme to sexually abuse underage girls. Specifically, the defendant enticed and recruited dozens of minor girls to engage in sex acts with him, for which he paid the victims hundreds of dollars in cash, in at least two different states. Victims were initially recruited to provide \"massages\" to the defendant, which would be performed nude or partially nude, would become increasingly sexual in nature, and would typically include one or more sex acts, including groping and direct or indirect contact with victims' genitals. To perpetuate this exploitation of underage girls, the defendant actively encouraged certain victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly sexually abused. He paid these victim-recruiters hundreds of dollars for each additional girl they brought to him, creating a network of underage victims for him to exploit in New York and Palm Beach.",
  50. "position": "main body"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000330",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Richard M. Berman"
  61. ],
  62. "organizations": [
  63. "Pretrial Services"
  64. ],
  65. "locations": [
  66. "New York",
  67. "Palm Beach"
  68. ],
  69. "dates": [
  70. "July 12, 2019"
  71. ],
  72. "reference_numbers": [
  73. "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
  74. "Document 11",
  75. "DOJ-OGR-00000330"
  76. ]
  77. },
  78. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case involving sexual abuse of minors. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
  79. }