mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000527.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 17 of 74 17\n\nyour Honor. It does raise the question of how many other safes are there in how many other locations with items like these.\n\nThe defendant also makes proposals that highlight, rather than mitigate, the dangers of granting bail. His offer to consent to extradition is unenforceable, and it highlights his extensive connections abroad.\n\nI should say, your Honor -- I forgot to mention -- the passport that I just referenced listed at the time his residence as Saudi Arabia, and this was from the 1980's.\n\nTHE COURT: Would you describe that passport again. I'm not sure I caught it.\n\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I can, your Honor.\n\nThe passport was issued in the name of a foreign country. It appears to have been issued sometime in the 1980's. It is expired currently. It has a photo that appears to be the defendant, and it has a name that is not Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nIn connection with that, I also want to note that the defendant's proposal for private security is inadequate and impractical and would put the defendant in the position of having complete financial control over the people who are supposed to guard him.\n\nAs this Court has written: \"What more compelling case for an order of detention is there than a case in which only an armed guard and the threat of deadly force is sufficient to\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000527",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 17 of 74 17",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "your Honor. It does raise the question of how many other safes are there in how many other locations with items like these.\n\nThe defendant also makes proposals that highlight, rather than mitigate, the dangers of granting bail. His offer to consent to extradition is unenforceable, and it highlights his extensive connections abroad.\n\nI should say, your Honor -- I forgot to mention -- the passport that I just referenced listed at the time his residence as Saudi Arabia, and this was from the 1980's.\n\nTHE COURT: Would you describe that passport again. I'm not sure I caught it.\n\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I can, your Honor.\n\nThe passport was issued in the name of a foreign country. It appears to have been issued sometime in the 1980's. It is expired currently. It has a photo that appears to be the defendant, and it has a name that is not Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nIn connection with that, I also want to note that the defendant's proposal for private security is inadequate and impractical and would put the defendant in the position of having complete financial control over the people who are supposed to guard him.\n\nAs this Court has written: \"What more compelling case for an order of detention is there than a case in which only an armed guard and the threat of deadly force is sufficient to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000527",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Saudi Arabia"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19",
      "1980's"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000527"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}