mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000529.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "19",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 19 of 74 19 defendant. THE COURT: Could you go back to those Florida police reports and tell us what you think they demonstrate. MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. They certainly suggest that there were individuals who believed that they were being harassed and interfered with by the defendant or his agents. That was investigators or other individuals working on behalf of or at the behest of the defendant. Now, those aren't charges proven in court. Those aren't convictions. But they certainly are factual occurrences that people reported contemporaneously and that are significant and concerning. With respect to just a couple of the Court's questions, bouncing around just slightly, with respect to the financial information which, again, is limited at best, the government took no position on the defendant's sealing application for, among other reasons, the fact that we did not know what they were going to submit. We imagined that it would be more detailed. Secondly, the government obviously had just hours to respond to the defendant's at that point. So we took no position and of course defer to the Court as to whether there is a valid reason to seal such limited and summary information. We will confer, your Honor, on whether we're able to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00000529",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 19 of 74 19",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "defendant. THE COURT: Could you go back to those Florida police reports and tell us what you think they demonstrate. MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor. They certainly suggest that there were individuals who believed that they were being harassed and interfered with by the defendant or his agents. That was investigators or other individuals working on behalf of or at the behest of the defendant. Now, those aren't charges proven in court. Those aren't convictions. But they certainly are factual occurrences that people reported contemporaneously and that are significant and concerning. With respect to just a couple of the Court's questions, bouncing around just slightly, with respect to the financial information which, again, is limited at best, the government took no position on the defendant's sealing application for, among other reasons, the fact that we did not know what they were going to submit. We imagined that it would be more detailed. Secondly, the government obviously had just hours to respond to the defendant's at that point. So we took no position and of course defer to the Court as to whether there is a valid reason to seal such limited and summary information. We will confer, your Honor, on whether we're able to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000529",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. ROSSMILLER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Florida"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000529"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}