mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000543.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "33",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 33 of 74 33\n1 don't find any case where that says 14 years, and it's over or\n2 it evaporates, etc.\n3 The argument though is that 14 years ought to be\n4 enough of a period of time. Right?\n5 MR. WEINBERG: I think the premise is that when the\n6 man was not under conditions of release, if your Honor was to\n7 exercise your power to release him, he didn't re-engage in this\n8 activity that constitutes the heart of both the Florida and the\n9 current New York prosecutions.\n10 And at a certain point, when you're dealing with the\n11 government's burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence\n12 going forward in the future, the idea that he would abandon his\n13 14 years of self-discipline when he's under conditions of bail\n14 that can result in his rearrest and re-detention -- I don't\n15 think the government can carry that weight or carry that\n16 burden.\n17 THE COURT: So I'm very interested in this question.\n18 It's a very interesting question. As you may or probably know,\n19 there are studies of recidivism, studies of recidivism directly\n20 related to sex offenders.\n21 I'll share with you what I've looked at because I\n22 don't want you to think I'm researching on my own anything that\n23 you are not aware of. These are, I think, government-supported\n24 studies that measure recidivism beyond 10 or 14 or 15 years and\n25 that purport, if I read these studies, to show that the nature\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000543",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 33 of 74 33",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 don't find any case where that says 14 years, and it's over or\n2 it evaporates, etc.\n3 The argument though is that 14 years ought to be\n4 enough of a period of time. Right?\n5 MR. WEINBERG: I think the premise is that when the\n6 man was not under conditions of release, if your Honor was to\n7 exercise your power to release him, he didn't re-engage in this\n8 activity that constitutes the heart of both the Florida and the\n9 current New York prosecutions.\n10 And at a certain point, when you're dealing with the\n11 government's burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence\n12 going forward in the future, the idea that he would abandon his\n13 14 years of self-discipline when he's under conditions of bail\n14 that can result in his rearrest and re-detention -- I don't\n15 think the government can carry that weight or carry that\n16 burden.\n17 THE COURT: So I'm very interested in this question.\n18 It's a very interesting question. As you may or probably know,\n19 there are studies of recidivism, studies of recidivism directly\n20 related to sex offenders.\n21 I'll share with you what I've looked at because I\n22 don't want you to think I'm researching on my own anything that\n23 you are not aware of. These are, I think, government-supported\n24 studies that measure recidivism beyond 10 or 14 or 15 years and\n25 that purport, if I read these studies, to show that the nature",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000543",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. WEINBERG"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Florida",
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000543"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}