mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000617.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "42",
    "date": "08/06/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42 Filed 08/06/19 Page 6 of 10 6 j7v2espC kjc 1 have the discovery, the subfacial discovery, if you will, so 2 that we could make a comprehensive briefing along the lines of 3 the schedule for motions. 4 THE COURT: That's what I was going to suggest, if 5 there is a time period when you could put it all together, as 6 it were, and there is a lot of flexibility. So I will leave 7 these dates, you know, for now. 8 With respect to the trial date, I could accommodate 9 either June or September of 2020. The issue is not so much as, 10 from my point of view, when you are all ready, but what part of 11 the calendar I block out. So is it realistic to block out time 12 in June? 13 MR. WEINBERG: I think it is -- I don't want to have 14 the court block out a six-week time and then come to the court 15 in March and say we need a continuance and risk a September 16 date. 17 THE COURT: Got it. Okay. So a September date, you 18 are saying, sounds like it certainly is realistic. 19 MR. WEINBERG: Thirteen months sounds like the amount 20 of time that we would ordinarily need to prepare a case of this 21 magnitude and scope. 22 THE COURT: All right. That is fine for me. 23 Just while we are taking care of details, a speedy 24 trial issue or application? Why don't we extend it to 25 September of 2020? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00000617",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42 Filed 08/06/19 Page 6 of 10 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "j7v2espC kjc",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 have the discovery, the subfacial discovery, if you will, so 2 that we could make a comprehensive briefing along the lines of 3 the schedule for motions. 4 THE COURT: That's what I was going to suggest, if 5 there is a time period when you could put it all together, as 6 it were, and there is a lot of flexibility. So I will leave 7 these dates, you know, for now. 8 With respect to the trial date, I could accommodate 9 either June or September of 2020. The issue is not so much as, 10 from my point of view, when you are all ready, but what part of 11 the calendar I block out. So is it realistic to block out time 12 in June? 13 MR. WEINBERG: I think it is -- I don't want to have 14 the court block out a six-week time and then come to the court 15 in March and say we need a continuance and risk a September 16 date. 17 THE COURT: Got it. Okay. So a September date, you 18 are saying, sounds like it certainly is realistic. 19 MR. WEINBERG: Thirteen months sounds like the amount 20 of time that we would ordinarily need to prepare a case of this 21 magnitude and scope. 22 THE COURT: All right. That is fine for me. 23 Just while we are taking care of details, a speedy 24 trial issue or application? Why don't we extend it to 25 September of 2020?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000617",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. WEINBERG"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "June 2020",
      "September 2020",
      "March",
      "08/06/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 42",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000617"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}