mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001060.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "119",
    "document_number": "20-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page119 of 200\n56\n1    hiding. She is a risk of flight because she changed her e-mail\n2    and phone number. That's what we heard in the opening brief.\n3    Well, what happened? Something the government, frankly, should\n4    know about, because it was certainly public, last year, in a\n5    civil litigation, in August of 2019, right around the time of\n6    the arrest of Mr. Epstein, the Second Circuit ruled that\n7    certain records in one of the civil cases should be unsealed\n8    and released to the public. That was done. There was no stay\n9    at the moment. The demand was issued, and the documents were\n10   released. Certain of those documents were supposed to be\n11   redacted and sometimes they were and sometimes they were not,\n12   documents including e-mail addresses, Social Security numbers,\n13   names, phone numbers, the sorts of things your Honor, I am\n14   sure, has to deal with all the time in these kinds of\n15   situations.\n16       But as it turned out, for whatever reason, some of the\n17   documents were not redacted and her e-mail address was\n18   revealed. Shortly after that, she starts getting strange\n19   e-mails. Her phone is hacked, and she had to change e-mails\n20   and change the account.\n21       Now she has got a phone that has legal materials on\n22   it, correspondence with her counsel in civil litigation that's\n23   been hacked, so she keeps it. Why does she keep it? Because\n24   she is in civil litigation. Her obligation is to keep\n25   evidence, not destroy it, and is advised that a way to keep it\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001060",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page119 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "56",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    hiding. She is a risk of flight because she changed her e-mail\n2    and phone number. That's what we heard in the opening brief.\n3    Well, what happened? Something the government, frankly, should\n4    know about, because it was certainly public, last year, in a\n5    civil litigation, in August of 2019, right around the time of\n6    the arrest of Mr. Epstein, the Second Circuit ruled that\n7    certain records in one of the civil cases should be unsealed\n8    and released to the public. That was done. There was no stay\n9    at the moment. The demand was issued, and the documents were\n10   released. Certain of those documents were supposed to be\n11   redacted and sometimes they were and sometimes they were not,\n12   documents including e-mail addresses, Social Security numbers,\n13   names, phone numbers, the sorts of things your Honor, I am\n14   sure, has to deal with all the time in these kinds of\n15   situations.\n16       But as it turned out, for whatever reason, some of the\n17   documents were not redacted and her e-mail address was\n18   revealed. Shortly after that, she starts getting strange\n19   e-mails. Her phone is hacked, and she had to change e-mails\n20   and change the account.\n21       Now she has got a phone that has legal materials on\n22   it, correspondence with her counsel in civil litigation that's\n23   been hacked, so she keeps it. Why does she keep it? Because\n24   she is in civil litigation. Her obligation is to keep\n25   evidence, not destroy it, and is advised that a way to keep it",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001060",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Second Circuit",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021",
      "August 2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "21-770",
      "20-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001060",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}