mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001330.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "40-1",
    "date": "04/12/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page13 of 25\n\ncitizenship; and (2) placement of a portion of her and her spouse's assets in a new account to be overseen by a monitor. (Ex. I). After considering multiple written submissions (Ex. I, J, K), Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request in another written opinion. (Ex. L).\n\n24. Judge Nathan concluded that Maxwell's new application did not disturb her prior conclusions. (Id. at 2). She reiterated that detention was warranted in light of the proffered strength and nature of the Government's case, Maxwell's \"substantial international ties, familial and personal connections abroad, substantial financial resources, and experience evading detection,\" and Maxwell's \"lack of candor regarding her assets\" at the time of her arrest. (Id. at 7).\n\n25. Judge Nathan rejected Maxwell's argument that the strength of the evidence was diminished by Maxwell's pending pre-trial motions. (Id. at 5-6). She also rejected the two additional conditions proposed by Maxwell, noting the \"[c]onsiderable uncertainty regarding the enforceability and practical impact of the [foreign citizenship] renunciations,\" and finding that, despite the proposed monitorship, Maxwell \"would continue to have access to substantial assets--certainly enough to enable her flight and to evade prosecution.\" (Id. at 10-11). Judge Nathan concluded, \"If the Court could conclude that any set of conditions could reasonably assure the Defendant's future appearance, it would order her release. Yet\n\n13\nDOJ-OGR-00001330",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page13 of 25",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "citizenship; and (2) placement of a portion of her and her spouse's assets in a new account to be overseen by a monitor. (Ex. I). After considering multiple written submissions (Ex. I, J, K), Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request in another written opinion. (Ex. L).\n\n24. Judge Nathan concluded that Maxwell's new application did not disturb her prior conclusions. (Id. at 2). She reiterated that detention was warranted in light of the proffered strength and nature of the Government's case, Maxwell's \"substantial international ties, familial and personal connections abroad, substantial financial resources, and experience evading detection,\" and Maxwell's \"lack of candor regarding her assets\" at the time of her arrest. (Id. at 7).\n\n25. Judge Nathan rejected Maxwell's argument that the strength of the evidence was diminished by Maxwell's pending pre-trial motions. (Id. at 5-6). She also rejected the two additional conditions proposed by Maxwell, noting the \"[c]onsiderable uncertainty regarding the enforceability and practical impact of the [foreign citizenship] renunciations,\" and finding that, despite the proposed monitorship, Maxwell \"would continue to have access to substantial assets--certainly enough to enable her flight and to evade prosecution.\" (Id. at 10-11). Judge Nathan concluded, \"If the Court could conclude that any set of conditions could reasonably assure the Defendant's future appearance, it would order her release. Yet",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001330",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Judge Nathan",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government",
      "Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/12/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 40-1",
      "3075763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001330"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is page 13 of 25."
}