mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001453.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "73",
    "date": "05/27/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page13 of 24\n\n\"renewed motion for pretrial relief,\" is both procedurally improper and substantively meritless. It should be denied.\n\nA. Applicable Law\n\n23. When seeking pretrial detention, the Government bears the burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant poses a risk of flight, and that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure her presence in court. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f); United States v. Sabhnani, 493 F.3d 63, 75 (2d Cir. 2007).\n\n24. Where the defendant is charged with certain offenses, including offenses involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 or 2423, a statutory presumption arises \"that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required . . .\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). In such a case, the defendant \"bears a limited burden of production—not a burden of persuasion—to rebut that presumption by coming forward with evidence that he does not pose . . . a risk of flight.\" United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001).\n\n25. Where the Government seeks detention based on flight risk, the court must consider: (1) \"the nature and circumstances of the offense charged\"; (2)",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page13 of 24",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "\"renewed motion for pretrial relief,\" is both procedurally improper and substantively meritless. It should be denied.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. Applicable Law",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "23. When seeking pretrial detention, the Government bears the burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant poses a risk of flight, and that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure her presence in court. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f); United States v. Sabhnani, 493 F.3d 63, 75 (2d Cir. 2007).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "24. Where the defendant is charged with certain offenses, including offenses involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 or 2423, a statutory presumption arises \"that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required . . .\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). In such a case, the defendant \"bears a limited burden of production—not a burden of persuasion—to rebut that presumption by coming forward with evidence that he does not pose . . . a risk of flight.\" United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "25. Where the Government seeks detention based on flight risk, the court must consider: (1) \"the nature and circumstances of the offense charged\"; (2)",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001453",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "05/27/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 73",
      "3109708",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)",
      "18 U.S.C. §§ 2422",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001453"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving pretrial detention. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}