mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001971.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "95",
    "date": "12/14/20",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 95 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2\n\nUnited States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits.\n\nThe Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits.\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: December 14, 2020\nNew York, New York\n\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 95 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dated: December 14, 2020\nNew York, New York",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Alison J. Nathan",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "signature",
      "content": "Alison J. Nathan and another signature",
      "position": "bottom"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "December 14, 2020",
      "1978",
      "1995"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 95",
      "44 F.3d 141",
      "435 U.S. 589"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order with a signature from the judge. The text is mostly printed, with two signatures at the bottom."
}