mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002205.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 2",
    "document_number": "101",
    "date": "12/23/20",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 101 Filed 12/23/20 Page 2 of 2\n\nLugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). As with the redactions to her renewed motion for bail, the proposed redactions here are narrowly tailored to serve substantial interests, including, most importantly, third parties' personal privacy interests. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). See also Dkt. No. 95.\n\nThe Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits by no later than December 23, 2020.\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: December 23, 2020\nNew York, New York\n\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge\n\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00002205",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 101 Filed 12/23/20 Page 2 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). As with the redactions to her renewed motion for bail, the proposed redactions here are narrowly tailored to serve substantial interests, including, most importantly, third parties' personal privacy interests. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). See also Dkt. No. 95.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits by no later than December 23, 2020.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dated: December 23, 2020\nNew York, New York",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Alison J. Nathan",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002205",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "December 23, 2020",
      "12/23/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 101",
      "Dkt. No. 95",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002205"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order with a signature from Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}