DOJ-OGR-00002206.json 5.7 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "102",
  5. "date": "12/23/20",
  6. "document_type": "Letter",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 102 Filed 12/23/20 Page 1 of 1\nCOHEN & GRESSER LLP\nMark S. Cohen\nChristian R. Everdell\n+1 (212) 957-7600\nmcohen@cohengresser.com\neverdell@cohengresser.com\n800 Third Avenue\nNew York, NY 10022\n+1 212 957 7600 phone\nwww.cohengresser.com\nDecember 18, 2020\nTO BE FILED UNDER SEAL\nVIA EMAIL (SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2(B)\nOF JUDGE NATHAN'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CRIMINAL CASES)\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, New York 10007\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nDear Judge Nathan:\nOn behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, and pursuant to the Court's order (Dkt. 89),\nwe respectfully submit under seal two versions of the Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell\nin Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail (the \"Reply\") and accompanying exhibits: an\nunredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed narrowly\ntailored redactions. The proposed redactions are based on the following: (1) privacy concerns, as\narticulated in our letters of November 25, 2020 (Dkt. 86) and November 30, 2020 (Dkt. 87); and\n(2) the Reply's reference to and discussion of Confidential Information, including financial\ndocuments and other materials, produced in discovery and governed by paragraph 15 of the\nProtective Order (Dkt. 36).\nPlease contact us with any questions. Your consideration is greatly appreciated.\nRespectfully submitted,\n/s/ Christian R. Everdell\nMark S. Cohen\nChristian R. Everdell\nCOHEN & GRESSER LLP\n800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor\nNew York, New York 10022\n(212) 957-7600\ncc: All counsel of record (via email)\nDOJ-OGR-00002206",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 102 Filed 12/23/20 Page 1 of 1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "COHEN & GRESSER LLP\nMark S. Cohen\nChristian R. Everdell\n+1 (212) 957-7600\nmcohen@cohengresser.com\neverdell@cohengresser.com",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "800 Third Avenue\nNew York, NY 10022\n+1 212 957 7600 phone\nwww.cohengresser.com",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "December 18, 2020",
  30. "position": "top"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL\nVIA EMAIL (SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2(B)\nOF JUDGE NATHAN'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CRIMINAL CASES)",
  35. "position": "top"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, New York 10007",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, and pursuant to the Court's order (Dkt. 89),\nwe respectfully submit under seal two versions of the Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell\nin Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail (the \"Reply\") and accompanying exhibits: an\nunredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed narrowly\ntailored redactions. The proposed redactions are based on the following: (1) privacy concerns, as\narticulated in our letters of November 25, 2020 (Dkt. 86) and November 30, 2020 (Dkt. 87); and\n(2) the Reply's reference to and discussion of Confidential Information, including financial\ndocuments and other materials, produced in discovery and governed by paragraph 15 of the\nProtective Order (Dkt. 36).",
  55. "position": "middle"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "Please contact us with any questions. Your consideration is greatly appreciated.",
  60. "position": "middle"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "Respectfully submitted,",
  65. "position": "middle"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "signature",
  69. "content": "/s/ Christian R. Everdell",
  70. "position": "middle"
  71. },
  72. {
  73. "type": "printed",
  74. "content": "Mark S. Cohen\nChristian R. Everdell\nCOHEN & GRESSER LLP\n800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor\nNew York, New York 10022\n(212) 957-7600",
  75. "position": "bottom"
  76. },
  77. {
  78. "type": "printed",
  79. "content": "cc: All counsel of record (via email)",
  80. "position": "footer"
  81. },
  82. {
  83. "type": "printed",
  84. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002206",
  85. "position": "footer"
  86. }
  87. ],
  88. "entities": {
  89. "people": [
  90. "Mark S. Cohen",
  91. "Christian R. Everdell",
  92. "Alison J. Nathan",
  93. "Ghislaine Maxwell"
  94. ],
  95. "organizations": [
  96. "COHEN & GRESSER LLP",
  97. "United States District Court",
  98. "Southern District of New York"
  99. ],
  100. "locations": [
  101. "New York",
  102. "40 Foley Square"
  103. ],
  104. "dates": [
  105. "December 18, 2020",
  106. "November 25, 2020",
  107. "November 30, 2020",
  108. "12/23/20"
  109. ],
  110. "reference_numbers": [
  111. "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  112. "Dkt. 89",
  113. "Dkt. 86",
  114. "Dkt. 87",
  115. "Dkt. 36",
  116. "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  117. "Document 102"
  118. ]
  119. },
  120. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from a law firm to a judge, discussing a court case and submitting documents under seal. The letter is typed and signed electronically. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
  121. }