| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2 of 23",
- "document_number": "134",
- "date": "02/04/21",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 23\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................................................................ii\nTABLE OF EXHIBITS...........................................................................................................................................iv\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT........................................................................................1\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................2\n A. The Protective Order in Giuffre v. Maxwell...............................................................................................2\n B. Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions.................................................................................................4\n C. The Settlement And Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order.....6\n D. The Government's False Statements To ....................................................................................................6\n E. Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government...................................................................10\nARGUMENT........................................................................................................................................................11\n A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence.......................................................................................................................................................11\n 1. The role of protective orders in civil litigation.......................................................................................11\n 2. The government circumvented the protective order................................................................................12\n 3. The government violated due process......................................................................................................14\n 4. This court possesses the inherent authority to order suppression.............................................................15\n B. At A Minimum, This Court Should Order A Hearing At Which Maxwell May Inquire Into The Circumstances Surrounding The Government's Misrepresentations To ...............................................................................................................................16\nCONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................16\nCertificate of Service...........................................................................................................................................18\n\nDOJ-OGR-00002349",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 23",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................................................................ii\nTABLE OF EXHIBITS...........................................................................................................................................iv\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT........................................................................................1\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................2\n A. The Protective Order in Giuffre v. Maxwell...............................................................................................2\n B. Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions.................................................................................................4\n C. The Settlement And Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order.....6\n D. The Government's False Statements To ....................................................................................................6\n E. Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government...................................................................10\nARGUMENT........................................................................................................................................................11\n A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence.......................................................................................................................................................11\n 1. The role of protective orders in civil litigation.......................................................................................11\n 2. The government circumvented the protective order................................................................................12\n 3. The government violated due process......................................................................................................14\n 4. This court possesses the inherent authority to order suppression.............................................................15\n B. At A Minimum, This Court Should Order A Hearing At Which Maxwell May Inquire Into The Circumstances Surrounding The Government's Misrepresentations To ...............................................................................................................................16\nCONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................16\nCertificate of Service...........................................................................................................................................18",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002349",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Maxwell",
- "Giuffre"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "02/04/21",
- "April 2016",
- "July 2016"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "Document 134",
- "DOJ-OGR-00002349"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. Some text is redacted, likely for privacy or sensitivity reasons. The document is a table of contents for a larger legal brief or argument."
- }
|