DOJ-OGR-00002430.json 2.6 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "21",
  4. "document_number": "136",
  5. "date": "02/04/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 21 of 27 Ex. K at 90-92. Here, Ms. Maxwell was asked questions about consensual sexual activity involving another woman and Mr. Epstein—questions that were wholly irrelevant to Giuffre’s defamation action against Ms. Maxwell. In the context of these questions, Ms. Maxwell was asked “with whom did Mr. Epstein have sexual activities.” Again, this imprecise, boundless, ambiguous, and untethered question drew an objection. The answer, charged as perjury, was that “when I was with him,” i.e., having sex with Epstein, Ms. Maxwell “wasn’t aware that he was having sexual activities with anyone” other than herself. Logical, and not perjury. The examiner then clarified: Not surprisingly, the answer was 16 DOJ-OGR-00002430",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 21 of 27",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Ex. K at 90-92. Here, Ms. Maxwell was asked questions about consensual sexual activity involving another woman and Mr. Epstein—questions that were wholly irrelevant to Giuffre’s defamation action against Ms. Maxwell. In the context of these questions, Ms. Maxwell was asked “with whom did Mr. Epstein have sexual activities.” Again, this imprecise, boundless, ambiguous, and untethered question drew an objection. The answer, charged as perjury, was that “when I was with him,” i.e., having sex with Epstein, Ms. Maxwell “wasn’t aware that he was having sexual activities with anyone” other than herself. Logical, and not perjury. The examiner then clarified: Not surprisingly, the answer was",
  20. "position": "main body"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "16",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002430",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Ms. Maxwell",
  36. "Mr. Epstein",
  37. "Giuffre"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [],
  40. "locations": [],
  41. "dates": [
  42. "02/04/21"
  43. ],
  44. "reference_numbers": [
  45. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  46. "Document 136",
  47. "DOJ-OGR-00002430"
  48. ]
  49. },
  50. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly printed, with some formatting indicating it is a legal document. There are no visible stamps or handwritten text."
  51. }