mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002469.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 3 of 33 2\n(Case called)\nTHE COURT: Good morning, counsel. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.\nNot that you are required to be present, but who is on for Ms. Giuffre, please?\nMS. MCCAWLEY: Good morning, your Honor. It is Sigrid McCawley from the law firm of Boies Schiller & Flexner on behalf of Virginia Giuffre.\nTHE COURT: Good morning.\nWho is on for Ms. Maxwell, please?\nMS. MENNINGER: Good morning, your Honor, Laura Menninger on behalf of Ms. Maxwell from Haddon Morgan and Foreman.\nTHE COURT: Good morning.\nCounsel, as you know, today the Court announces its rulings on the unsealing of the motions associated with docket entries 231, 279, 315, 320, and 335 in Giuffre v. Maxwell, as well as the documents relevant to those motions.\nAt has become the custom, the Court will announce its general findings relevant to this round of unsealing before marching through its specific findings for each document.\nAs to the Court's general findings, to determine whether materials should be unsealed, the Court's mandate is to undertake a particularized review of each document and to: (1) evaluate the weight of the presumption of public access to the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 3 of 33 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Case called)\nTHE COURT: Good morning, counsel. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.\nNot that you are required to be present, but who is on for Ms. Giuffre, please?\nMS. MCCAWLEY: Good morning, your Honor. It is Sigrid McCawley from the law firm of Boies Schiller & Flexner on behalf of Virginia Giuffre.\nTHE COURT: Good morning.\nWho is on for Ms. Maxwell, please?\nMS. MENNINGER: Good morning, your Honor, Laura Menninger on behalf of Ms. Maxwell from Haddon Morgan and Foreman.\nTHE COURT: Good morning.\nCounsel, as you know, today the Court announces its rulings on the unsealing of the motions associated with docket entries 231, 279, 315, 320, and 335 in Giuffre v. Maxwell, as well as the documents relevant to those motions.\nAt has become the custom, the Court will announce its general findings relevant to this round of unsealing before marching through its specific findings for each document.\nAs to the Court's general findings, to determine whether materials should be unsealed, the Court's mandate is to undertake a particularized review of each document and to: (1) evaluate the weight of the presumption of public access to the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Sigrid McCawley",
      "Virginia Giuffre",
      "Laura Menninger",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Boies Schiller & Flexner",
      "Haddon Morgan and Foreman",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "136-9",
      "231",
      "279",
      "315",
      "320",
      "335"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}