mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002488.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "22",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 22 of 33 21\n1 369-3. Excerpts from Ms. Maxwell's June 2016 deposition. As before.\n2\n3 369-4. Excerpts from a Doe's deposition. Not up to that Doe yet. Keep sealed.\n4\n5 Same with 269-5. Another Doe we are not up to yet. Keep sealed.\n6\n7 369-6. This is depositions of a Doe. The Second Circuit has already released this transcript, so it remains released subject to the redactions ordered by the Second Circuit.\n8\n9\n10 Circuit.\n11 369-7. Excerpts from Doe 1's deposition. The Second Circuit already released this transcript without redactions.\n12\n13 369-8. Excerpts of the deposition of a Doe. The Second Circuit already released this transcript without redactions.\n14\n15 redactions.\n16 369-9. Flight logs. This document was also released by the Second Circuit without redactions.\n17\n18 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Judge, I need to interrupt. I was just informed that apparently somebody is broadcasting this on to YouTube, so I don't know if you want to give a reminder that that is illegal to do.\n19\n20 THE COURT: Whoever is doing it, you are operating against the law. I suspect there is a way to find out. So I will ask you, most respectfully, to stop doing it. We have had enough of lack of the rule of law around here. Let's try to\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00002488",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 22 of 33 21",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 369-3. Excerpts from Ms. Maxwell's June 2016 deposition. As before.\n2\n3 369-4. Excerpts from a Doe's deposition. Not up to that Doe yet. Keep sealed.\n4\n5 Same with 269-5. Another Doe we are not up to yet. Keep sealed.\n6\n7 369-6. This is depositions of a Doe. The Second Circuit has already released this transcript, so it remains released subject to the redactions ordered by the Second Circuit.\n8\n9\n10 Circuit.\n11 369-7. Excerpts from Doe 1's deposition. The Second Circuit already released this transcript without redactions.\n12\n13 369-8. Excerpts of the deposition of a Doe. The Second Circuit already released this transcript without redactions.\n14\n15 redactions.\n16 369-9. Flight logs. This document was also released by the Second Circuit without redactions.\n17",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE DEPUTY CLERK: Judge, I need to interrupt. I was just informed that apparently somebody is broadcasting this on to YouTube, so I don't know if you want to give a reminder that that is illegal to do.\n19\n20 THE COURT: Whoever is doing it, you are operating against the law. I suspect there is a way to find out. So I will ask you, most respectfully, to stop doing it. We have had enough of lack of the rule of law around here. Let's try to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002488",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Doe",
      "Judge"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Second Circuit",
      "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "June 2016",
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "136-9",
      "369-3",
      "369-4",
      "269-5",
      "369-6",
      "369-7",
      "369-8",
      "369-9",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002488"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some references to sealed documents and redactions. The conversation between the Deputy Clerk and the Court suggests that someone is broadcasting the proceedings on YouTube, which is against the law."
}