mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002498.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "32 of 33",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case: 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 32 of 33 31\n1 the Court is not obliged to do the balancing test that the\n2 Court has so carefully done today and previously. The fact\n3 that someone -- there is going to be many reasons why a party\n4 doesn't want to weigh in, and it doesn't absolve the Court and\n5 the parties from the obligation of taking those steps, even if\n6 it is a burden. That's part of the process here, Judge.\n7 THE COURT: Anything else, counsel?\n8 MS. WALSH: Christine Walsh from Holland & Knight, on\n9 behalf of the Miami Herald.\n10 We do agree with Ms. McCawley that the process seems\n11 to be duplicative with regards to the Does who are not\n12 responding that the Court will need to go back and revisit\n13 documents that are being released piecemeal. And if there is\n14 not objections, those should be considered at one time.\n15 THE COURT: Anything else, counsel?\n16 MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. One more option for\n17 you to consider, with Ms. Menninger raising the concern about\n18 people who we didn't get a return receipt from. We can also\n19 segregate out those for whom we did get a return receipt from,\n20 meaning they received it, we got the return receipt, and they\n21 did not object, so we would have that body. If that's a\n22 concern for the Court, we could narrow it at least somewhat.\n23 THE COURT: Anything else, counsel?\n24 Thank you. Some of you have taken the words right out\n25 of my mouth.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00002498",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case: 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 32 of 33 31",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "the Court is not obliged to do the balancing test that the\nCourt has so carefully done today and previously. The fact\nthat someone -- there is going to be many reasons why a party\ndoesn't want to weigh in, and it doesn't absolve the Court and\nthe parties from the obligation of taking those steps, even if\nit is a burden. That's part of the process here, Judge.\nTHE COURT: Anything else, counsel?\nMS. WALSH: Christine Walsh from Holland & Knight, on\nbehalf of the Miami Herald.\nWe do agree with Ms. McCawley that the process seems\nto be duplicative with regards to the Does who are not\nresponding that the Court will need to go back and revisit\ndocuments that are being released piecemeal. And if there is\nnot objections, those should be considered at one time.\nTHE COURT: Anything else, counsel?\nMS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. One more option for\nyou to consider, with Ms. Menninger raising the concern about\npeople who we didn't get a return receipt from. We can also\nsegregate out those for whom we did get a return receipt from,\nmeaning they received it, we got the return receipt, and they\ndid not object, so we would have that body. If that's a\nconcern for the Court, we could narrow it at least somewhat.\nTHE COURT: Anything else, counsel?\nThank you. Some of you have taken the words right out\nof my mouth.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002498",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Christine Walsh",
      "Ms. McCawley",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Holland & Knight",
      "Miami Herald",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "136-9",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002498"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}