| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "153",
- "document_number": "204",
- "date": "04/16/21",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 153 of 239\n\nA. I could only recall my family members that were there and I could not make a list of anyone else because that list -- it never happened that I can think of.\n\nQ. I'm talking about the time you were working for Jeffrey Epstein, can you list all girls that you found for Jeffrey Epstein that were under the age of 18 to come work for him in any capacity?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n\nA. I didn't find the girls.\n\nQ. You chose the word.\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: If you have a question ask it, you don't choose the word.\n\nQ. List all of the girls you met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein's home for the purposes of employment that were under the age of 18?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n\nA. I've already characterized my job was to find people, adults, professional people to do the jobs I listed before; pool person, secretary, house person, chef, pilot, architect.\n\nQ. I'm asking about individuals under the age of 18, not adult persons, people under the age of 18.\n\nA. I looked for people or tried to find people to fill professional jobs in professional situations.\n\nQ. So Virginia Roberts was under the age of 18, correct?\n\nA. I think we've established that Virginia was 17.\n\nQ. Is she the -- sorry, go ahead. Is she the only individual that you met for purposes of hiring someone for Jeffrey that was under the age of 18?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form and Mischaracterizes her testimony.\n\nA. I didn't hire people.\n\nQ. I said met.\n\n126\n\nDOJ-OGR-00003087",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 153 of 239",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "A. I could only recall my family members that were there and I could not make a list of anyone else because that list -- it never happened that I can think of.\n\nQ. I'm talking about the time you were working for Jeffrey Epstein, can you list all girls that you found for Jeffrey Epstein that were under the age of 18 to come work for him in any capacity?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n\nA. I didn't find the girls.\n\nQ. You chose the word.\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: If you have a question ask it, you don't choose the word.\n\nQ. List all of the girls you met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein's home for the purposes of employment that were under the age of 18?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation.\n\nA. I've already characterized my job was to find people, adults, professional people to do the jobs I listed before; pool person, secretary, house person, chef, pilot, architect.\n\nQ. I'm asking about individuals under the age of 18, not adult persons, people under the age of 18.\n\nA. I looked for people or tried to find people to fill professional jobs in professional situations.\n\nQ. So Virginia Roberts was under the age of 18, correct?\n\nA. I think we've established that Virginia was 17.\n\nQ. Is she the -- sorry, go ahead. Is she the only individual that you met for purposes of hiring someone for Jeffrey that was under the age of 18?\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to form and Mischaracterizes her testimony.\n\nA. I didn't hire people.\n\nQ. I said met.",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "126",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003087",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Jeffrey Epstein",
- "Virginia Roberts",
- "MR. PAGLIUCA"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "04/16/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "Document 204",
- "DOJ-OGR-00003087"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
- }
|