mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004736.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 2",
    "document_number": "297",
    "date": "06/02/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 297 Filed 06/02/21 Page 2 of 2\n- November 8, 2021: Defense disclosures pursuant to Rules 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) materials (The Government proposed November 1, 2021; the Defendant proposed the close of the Government's case-in-chief)\n- Close of the Government's case-in-chief: Defense witness list and 26.2 statements (Defendant's proposal)\nThese dates establish a baseline for when the parties must disclose certain materials.\nEach of the parties has a continuing obligation to update all disclosures if they become aware of additional responsive materials. In addition, and as requested by the parties, the parties may bring issues to the Court's attention that arise after the deadline for motions in limine if the issues could not have been raised within the deadline set for in limine motions.\nSO ORDERED.\nDated: June 2, 2021\nNew York, New York\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 297 Filed 06/02/21 Page 2 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "- November 8, 2021: Defense disclosures pursuant to Rules 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) materials (The Government proposed November 1, 2021; the Defendant proposed the close of the Government's case-in-chief)\n- Close of the Government's case-in-chief: Defense witness list and 26.2 statements (Defendant's proposal)\nThese dates establish a baseline for when the parties must disclose certain materials.\nEach of the parties has a continuing obligation to update all disclosures if they become aware of additional responsive materials. In addition, and as requested by the parties, the parties may bring issues to the Court's attention that arise after the deadline for motions in limine if the issues could not have been raised within the deadline set for in limine motions.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Alis. J. Nathan",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dated: June 2, 2021\nNew York, New York\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
      "position": "bottom"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "November 8, 2021",
      "November 1, 2021",
      "June 2, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "297"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order with a signature from Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}