mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005941.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "31",
    "document_number": "397-2",
    "date": "10/29/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 31 of 45\n\n164 McElvaney\n\njustified. Hershkowitz et al. (2007) interviewed children about their initial disclosures prior to formal interview and 50 per cent of the sample (n = 30) reported feeling afraid or ashamed of their parents' reaction. The authors reported that parents did show a tendency to blame their children and react angrily to the disclosure.\n\nRecent research has highlighted the need for children to be asked direct questions to facilitate their disclosure. Of those children who did disclose, significant proportions disclosed following prompts rather than it being initiated by the child (Kogan, 2004). Qualitative studies drawing on interviews with children that focus on the disclosure process are important in investigating the precise circumstances that led to disclosures for children. McElvaney (2008) found that parents' questioning of children was prompted by their concern about the young person's emotional distress. On occasion, young people were communicating that something was not right in their world but were not able to articulate this verbally. Signs of psychological distress were, however, evident and questions targeted at the reasons for this distress were identified by McElvaney as a factor that helped young people to tell. Thus, many children may not have told about their experiences of abuse because they were not asked. McGee et al. (2002) followed up a sample of their respondents who had disclosed childhood abuse for the first time in their survey. When asked why they had not disclosed prior to the survey, many respondents noted that it was because they had not been asked. Increasingly, research studies are finding that significant proportions of disclosure have been prompted by questions by caregivers, friends or others in the child's educational and social milieu that in themselves provide an opportunity for the young person to tell (Jensen et al., 2005; Hershkowitz et al., 2007; McElvaney et al., 2012).\n\n'Investigating the precise circumstances that led to disclosures for children'\n\n'Significant proportions of disclosure have been prompted by questions by caregivers, friends or others'\n\nFinally, some children need time to tell. Mudaly and Goddard (2006) quote a 13-year-old girl: 'she (mother) helped by not making me, not rushing me to get it out, which, um, I think it's a really stupid idea to make kids get it out A.S.A.P.' (p. 91).\n\nImplications for Practice\n\nThe consensus in the research literature at the present time is that disclosure is multi-determined, influenced by a complex range of factors that may influence each child in a different way. Large-scale national probability studies confirm that non-disclosure and delays in disclosure are significant problems facing society and in particular for those professionals tasked with safeguarding the wellbeing of children. Children's fears and anxieties in relation to telling need to be understood and contained by those in their environment so that early disclosure can be encouraged and facilitated.\n\n'The implications of these findings can be considered in interrelated contexts'\n\nThe implications of these findings can be considered in interrelated contexts: the legal context where action can only be taken if the child is able to give a clear, credible account of his/her experiences; child protection and therapeutic contexts where a comprehensive account is required to enable child protection professionals to intervene and where the psychological sequelae can be addressed to minimise the long-term impact of the experiences; and family and community contexts where early disclosure needs to be encouraged, and\n\nCopyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Child Abuse Rev. Vol. 24: 159–169 (2015) DOI: 10.1002/car DOJ-OGR-00005941",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 31 of 45",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "164 McElvaney",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "justified. Hershkowitz et al. (2007) interviewed children about their initial disclosures prior to formal interview and 50 per cent of the sample (n = 30) reported feeling afraid or ashamed of their parents' reaction. The authors reported that parents did show a tendency to blame their children and react angrily to the disclosure.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Recent research has highlighted the need for children to be asked direct questions to facilitate their disclosure. Of those children who did disclose, significant proportions disclosed following prompts rather than it being initiated by the child (Kogan, 2004). Qualitative studies drawing on interviews with children that focus on the disclosure process are important in investigating the precise circumstances that led to disclosures for children. McElvaney (2008) found that parents' questioning of children was prompted by their concern about the young person's emotional distress. On occasion, young people were communicating that something was not right in their world but were not able to articulate this verbally. Signs of psychological distress were, however, evident and questions targeted at the reasons for this distress were identified by McElvaney as a factor that helped young people to tell. Thus, many children may not have told about their experiences of abuse because they were not asked. McGee et al. (2002) followed up a sample of their respondents who had disclosed childhood abuse for the first time in their survey. When asked why they had not disclosed prior to the survey, many respondents noted that it was because they had not been asked. Increasingly, research studies are finding that significant proportions of disclosure have been prompted by questions by caregivers, friends or others in the child's educational and social milieu that in themselves provide an opportunity for the young person to tell (Jensen et al., 2005; Hershkowitz et al., 2007; McElvaney et al., 2012).",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "'Investigating the precise circumstances that led to disclosures for children'",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "'Significant proportions of disclosure have been prompted by questions by caregivers, friends or others'",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Finally, some children need time to tell. Mudaly and Goddard (2006) quote a 13-year-old girl: 'she (mother) helped by not making me, not rushing me to get it out, which, um, I think it's a really stupid idea to make kids get it out A.S.A.P.' (p. 91).",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Implications for Practice",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The consensus in the research literature at the present time is that disclosure is multi-determined, influenced by a complex range of factors that may influence each child in a different way. Large-scale national probability studies confirm that non-disclosure and delays in disclosure are significant problems facing society and in particular for those professionals tasked with safeguarding the wellbeing of children. Children's fears and anxieties in relation to telling need to be understood and contained by those in their environment so that early disclosure can be encouraged and facilitated.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "'The implications of these findings can be considered in interrelated contexts'",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The implications of these findings can be considered in interrelated contexts: the legal context where action can only be taken if the child is able to give a clear, credible account of his/her experiences; child protection and therapeutic contexts where a comprehensive account is required to enable child protection professionals to intervene and where the psychological sequelae can be addressed to minimise the long-term impact of the experiences; and family and community contexts where early disclosure needs to be encouraged, and",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Child Abuse Rev. Vol. 24: 159–169 (2015) DOI: 10.1002/car",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005941",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Hershkowitz",
      "Kogan",
      "McElvaney",
      "McGee",
      "Jensen",
      "Mudaly",
      "Goddard"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2002",
      "2004",
      "2005",
      "2007",
      "2008",
      "2012",
      "2013",
      "2015",
      "10/29/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "397-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00005941"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to child abuse, with a focus on the disclosure of abuse by children. The text includes references to various research studies and authors in the field."
}