DOJ-OGR-00006080.json 3.4 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "14",
  4. "document_number": "410-1",
  5. "date": "11/04/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 14 of 93\n\nThe Indictment\n\nThe defendant, GHISLAINE MAXWELLGhislaine Maxwell, has been formally charged in what is called an \"Indictment.\" As I instructed you at the outset of this trial, the Indictment is simply a charge or accusation. It is not evidence. It is not proof of the defendant'sMs. Maxwell's guilt. It creates no presumption and it permits no inference that that the defendant is guilty. Ms. Maxwell begins trial with an absolutely clean slate and without any evidence against her. You must give no weight to the fact that an Indictment has been returned against the defendantMs. Maxwell.\n\nI will not read the entire Indictment to you at this time. Rather, I will first summarize the offenses charged in the Indictment and then explain in detail the elements of each of the offenses.\n\nAdapted from the charge of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan in United States v. Jones, 16 Cr. 533 (AJN) and in United States v. Pizarro, 17 Cr. 151 (AJN).\n\n14\n\nDOJ-OGR-00006080",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 14 of 93",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "The Indictment",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "The defendant, GHISLAINE MAXWELLGhislaine Maxwell, has been formally charged in what is called an \"Indictment.\" As I instructed you at the outset of this trial, the Indictment is simply a charge or accusation. It is not evidence. It is not proof of the defendant'sMs. Maxwell's guilt. It creates no presumption and it permits no inference that that the defendant is guilty. Ms. Maxwell begins trial with an absolutely clean slate and without any evidence against her. You must give no weight to the fact that an Indictment has been returned against the defendantMs. Maxwell.",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "I will not read the entire Indictment to you at this time. Rather, I will first summarize the offenses charged in the Indictment and then explain in detail the elements of each of the offenses.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Adapted from the charge of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan in United States v. Jones, 16 Cr. 533 (AJN) and in United States v. Pizarro, 17 Cr. 151 (AJN).",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "14",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006080",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "GHISLAINE MAXWELL",
  51. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  52. "Alison J. Nathan"
  53. ],
  54. "organizations": [
  55. "DOJ"
  56. ],
  57. "locations": [],
  58. "dates": [
  59. "11/04/21"
  60. ],
  61. "reference_numbers": [
  62. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  63. "410-1",
  64. "16 Cr. 533",
  65. "17 Cr. 151",
  66. "DOJ-OGR-00006080"
  67. ]
  68. },
  69. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
  70. }