DOJ-OGR-00006132.json 3.1 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "66",
  4. "document_number": "410-1",
  5. "date": "11/04/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 66 of 93 may you use evidence that I have instructed you was admitted for a limited purpose for any inference beyond that limited purpose. In addition, you may not infer that the defendant Ms. Maxwell is guilty of participating in criminal conduct merely from the fact that she associated with other people who were guilty of wrongdoing or merely because he has or had knowledge of the wrongdoing of others. Here again, let me remind you that, whether based upon direct or circumstantial evidence, or upon the logical, reasonable inferences drawn from such evidence, you must be satisfied of the guilt of the defendant Ms. Maxwell as to each count charged before you may convict her as to that count. Adapted from the charge of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan in United States v. Jones, 16 Cr. 553 (AJN) and in United States v. Pizarro, 17 Cr. 151 (AJN). 66 DOJ-OGR-00006132",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 66 of 93",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "may you use evidence that I have instructed you was admitted for a limited purpose for any inference beyond that limited purpose. In addition, you may not infer that the defendant Ms. Maxwell is guilty of participating in criminal conduct merely from the fact that she associated with other people who were guilty of wrongdoing or merely because he has or had knowledge of the wrongdoing of others. Here again, let me remind you that, whether based upon direct or circumstantial evidence, or upon the logical, reasonable inferences drawn from such evidence, you must be satisfied of the guilt of the defendant Ms. Maxwell as to each count charged before you may convict her as to that count.",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Adapted from the charge of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan in United States v. Jones, 16 Cr. 553 (AJN) and in United States v. Pizarro, 17 Cr. 151 (AJN).",
  25. "position": "main content"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "66",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006132",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Ms. Maxwell",
  41. "Alison J. Nathan"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "United States"
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "11/04/21"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "410-1",
  53. "16 Cr. 553",
  54. "17 Cr. 151",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00006132"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or jury instruction from a criminal case. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is in good condition with no apparent damage or redactions."
  59. }