mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006156.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "90 of 93",
    "document_number": "410-1",
    "date": "11/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 90 of 93\n\nPunishment Not to be Considered by the Jury\n\nUnder your oath as jurors, you cannot allow a consideration of possible punishment that may be imposed upon a defendant Ms. Maxwell, if convicted, to influence you in any way or in any sense to enter into your deliberations. If you unanimously conclude that the government has proved Ms. Maxwell's guilt as to any charge beyond a reasonable doubt, the duty of imposing sentence is mine and mine alone. Your function is to weigh the evidence in the case and to determine whether the defendant Ms. Maxwell is or is not guilty based upon the evidence and the law.\n\nTherefore, I instruct you not to consider punishment or possible punishment in any way in your deliberations in this case.\n\nAdapted from the charge of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan in United States v. Pizarro, 17 Cr. 151 (AJN); from the charge of the Hon. Denise L. Cote in United States v. Purcell, 18 Cr. 081 (DLC); and charge of the Hon. P. Kevin Castel in United States v. William Walters, 16 Cr. 338 (PKC).\n\nCommented [RA(105): GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: This clause is unnecessary and redundant in light of the other jury instructions\n\nDOJ-OGR-00006156",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 90 of 93",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Punishment Not to be Considered by the Jury",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Under your oath as jurors, you cannot allow a consideration of possible punishment that may be imposed upon a defendant Ms. Maxwell, if convicted, to influence you in any way or in any sense to enter into your deliberations. If you unanimously conclude that the government has proved Ms. Maxwell's guilt as to any charge beyond a reasonable doubt, the duty of imposing sentence is mine and mine alone. Your function is to weigh the evidence in the case and to determine whether the defendant Ms. Maxwell is or is not guilty based upon the evidence and the law.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Therefore, I instruct you not to consider punishment or possible punishment in any way in your deliberations in this case.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Adapted from the charge of the Hon. Alison J. Nathan in United States v. Pizarro, 17 Cr. 151 (AJN); from the charge of the Hon. Denise L. Cote in United States v. Purcell, 18 Cr. 081 (DLC); and charge of the Hon. P. Kevin Castel in United States v. William Walters, 16 Cr. 338 (PKC).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "Commented [RA(105): GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: This clause is unnecessary and redundant in light of the other jury instructions",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006156",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Denise L. Cote",
      "P. Kevin Castel",
      "Pizarro",
      "Purcell",
      "William Walters"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "410-1",
      "17 Cr. 151",
      "18 Cr. 081",
      "16 Cr. 338",
      "DOJ-OGR-00006156"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or jury instruction from a criminal case. The text is mostly printed, with one handwritten comment in the margin. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}