DOJ-OGR-00006331.json 5.4 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "431",
  5. "date": "11/09/21",
  6. "document_type": "Court Order",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": true
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 431 Filed 11/09/21 Page 1 of 2\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\nUSDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 11/9/21\n20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nAs noted in its previous Order, the Court will hold an in-person proceeding on November 10, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 409. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 110 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York.\nThe purpose of the proceeding is to address the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378, the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386, and the other outstanding issues that overlap with these two motions as discussed at the November 1, 2021 conference. As is expressly required by Federal Rule of Evidence 412, the Court must conduct a hearing on this motion in camera and seal the record of the hearing. Fed. R. Evid. 412(c)(2). Accordingly, this portion of the hearing will be sealed and in camera. The Government confirmed that the attorneys for the alleged victims implicated by the Defendant's motion have been notified of their right to attend the hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. Dkt. No. 430.\nFor the public portions of the proceeding, the Court will ensure access for alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family, in accordance with its prior Order. Dkt. No. 344.\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00006331",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 431 Filed 11/09/21 Page 1 of 2",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "stamp",
  29. "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 11/9/21",
  30. "position": "margin"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER",
  35. "position": "top"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "As noted in its previous Order, the Court will hold an in-person proceeding on November 10, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 409. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 110 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York.",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "The purpose of the proceeding is to address the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378, the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386, and the other outstanding issues that overlap with these two motions as discussed at the November 1, 2021 conference. As is expressly required by Federal Rule of Evidence 412, the Court must conduct a hearing on this motion in camera and seal the record of the hearing. Fed. R. Evid. 412(c)(2). Accordingly, this portion of the hearing will be sealed and in camera. The Government confirmed that the attorneys for the alleged victims implicated by the Defendant's motion have been notified of their right to attend the hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. Dkt. No. 430.",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "For the public portions of the proceeding, the Court will ensure access for alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family, in accordance with its prior Order. Dkt. No. 344.",
  55. "position": "middle"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "1",
  60. "position": "footer"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006331",
  65. "position": "footer"
  66. }
  67. ],
  68. "entities": {
  69. "people": [
  70. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  71. "Alison J. Nathan"
  72. ],
  73. "organizations": [
  74. "United States District Court",
  75. "United States of America"
  76. ],
  77. "locations": [
  78. "New York",
  79. "Southern District of New York",
  80. "Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse",
  81. "Foley Square"
  82. ],
  83. "dates": [
  84. "November 10, 2021",
  85. "November 1, 2021",
  86. "11/09/21",
  87. "11/9/21"
  88. ],
  89. "reference_numbers": [
  90. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  91. "Document 431",
  92. "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
  93. "Dkt. No. 409",
  94. "Dkt. No. 378",
  95. "Dkt. No. 386",
  96. "Dkt. No. 344",
  97. "Dkt. No. 430",
  98. "DOJ-OGR-00006331"
  99. ]
  100. },
  101. "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a formal and official document, with a stamp indicating electronic filing. The content is related to a court proceeding involving Ghislaine Maxwell."
  102. }