mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006519.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "440",
    "date": "11/12/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page 3 of 40 G. Evidence or Argument About the Minor Victims' Consent is Categorically Inadmissible .................................................................................................... 35 H. The Court Should Be Wary of the Defense Refusal to Address the Government's Motions............................................................................................................................... 37 I. The Court Should Not Allow the Defense to Suggest to the Jury That The Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation................................................................ 38 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 38 2 DOJ-OGR-00006519",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page 3 of 40",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "G. Evidence or Argument About the Minor Victims' Consent is Categorically Inadmissible .................................................................................................... 35",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "H. The Court Should Be Wary of the Defense Refusal to Address the Government's Motions............................................................................................................................... 37",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "I. The Court Should Not Allow the Defense to Suggest to the Jury That The Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation................................................................ 38",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 38",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006519",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/12/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "440",
      "DOJ-OGR-00006519"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is paginated, with this page being page 3 of 40."
}