mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007004.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "32 of 43",
    "document_number": "459",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 32 of 43 32 LalWmaxC\nRossmiller be included. We believe his name will come up during the course of the trial, and he is a member of the U.S. Attorney's Office.\nTHE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz.\nMS. POMERANTZ: The government, again, isn't aware of any reason why his name would come up at trial, and so the government submits that it's not necessary to include him in the questionnaire.\nTHE COURT: All right. Well, I'm not going to resolve that now. Since his name may come up, to be decided shortly, I don't see any prejudice, so I will allow it. We will add Alexander Rossmiller to the list of past -- or with any of the assistant United States attorneys, we could say \"who have been involved with prosecuting this case.\"\nOK, Ms. Sternheim?\nMS. STERNHEIM: And the last, your Honor, has to do with No. 44.\nTHE COURT: OK.\nMS. STERNHEIM: We would ask that you include the word \"protested.\" I can read it fully if that's more helpful.\nTHE COURT: Go ahead.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Would that help?\nTHE COURT: Yes, please.\nMS. STERNHEIM: OK. \"Have you or a family member ever lobbied, petitioned, protested, or worked in any other manner\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007004",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 32 of 43 32 LalWmaxC",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Rossmiller be included. We believe his name will come up during the course of the trial, and he is a member of the U.S. Attorney's Office.\nTHE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz.\nMS. POMERANTZ: The government, again, isn't aware of any reason why his name would come up at trial, and so the government submits that it's not necessary to include him in the questionnaire.\nTHE COURT: All right. Well, I'm not going to resolve that now. Since his name may come up, to be decided shortly, I don't see any prejudice, so I will allow it. We will add Alexander Rossmiller to the list of past -- or with any of the assistant United States attorneys, we could say \"who have been involved with prosecuting this case.\"\nOK, Ms. Sternheim?\nMS. STERNHEIM: And the last, your Honor, has to do with No. 44.\nTHE COURT: OK.\nMS. STERNHEIM: We would ask that you include the word \"protested.\" I can read it fully if that's more helpful.\nTHE COURT: Go ahead.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Would that help?\nTHE COURT: Yes, please.\nMS. STERNHEIM: OK. \"Have you or a family member ever lobbied, petitioned, protested, or worked in any other manner",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007004",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alexander Rossmiller",
      "Ms. Pomerantz",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "U.S. Attorney's Office",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 459",
      "No. 44",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007004"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}