mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007006.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "34",
    "document_number": "459",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 34 of 43 34 LalWmaxC I think that's a helpful addition. I'm not sure what is gained, other than some potential confusion, out of the additional language you're suggesting. MS. STERNHEIM: Well, one word that is lacking in that first part is \"support,\" and we believe it's important to identify individuals who have been supporters or involved in the Me Too or Times Up movements. I don't think the question as originally stated is broad enough to do that. THE COURT: Just a moment. How about \"Have you or a family member ever supported, petitioned, protested, or worked in any other manner for or against any laws or regulations or organizations relating to sex trafficking, sex crimes against minors, sex abuse, or sexual harassment?\" Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. That would suffice. THE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz. MS. POMERANTZ: That's fine with the government. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. We'll make that change. Anything else, Ms. Sternheim? MS. STERNHEIM: No. Thank you. MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, if I may, in light of the issue raised by the defense on 32(d), the government would request that as to 32(e) additional names of defense attorneys SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007006",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 Filed 11/15/21 Page 34 of 43 34",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LalWmaxC I think that's a helpful addition. I'm not sure what is gained, other than some potential confusion, out of the additional language you're suggesting. MS. STERNHEIM: Well, one word that is lacking in that first part is \"support,\" and we believe it's important to identify individuals who have been supporters or involved in the Me Too or Times Up movements. I don't think the question as originally stated is broad enough to do that. THE COURT: Just a moment. How about \"Have you or a family member ever supported, petitioned, protested, or worked in any other manner for or against any laws or regulations or organizations relating to sex trafficking, sex crimes against minors, sex abuse, or sexual harassment?\" Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. That would suffice. THE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz. MS. POMERANTZ: That's fine with the government. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. We'll make that change. Anything else, Ms. Sternheim? MS. STERNHEIM: No. Thank you. MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, if I may, in light of the issue raised by the defense on 32(d), the government would request that as to 32(e) additional names of defense attorneys",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007006",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Judge"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Me Too",
      "Times Up",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "459",
      "32(d)",
      "32(e)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007006"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the judge and lawyers about a question to be asked. The text is typed, and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
}