mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007097.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "46",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 46 of 127\nLB15MAX2\n\n1 MS. MOE: But, beyond that, your Honor, we don't\n2 anticipate this would be an issue.\n3 THE COURT: OK. I think we are in agreement.\n4 My clerk noted I inadvertently skipped over Government\n5 so we will return to that. This is the government's\n6 expectation that the testimony of certain witnesses would\n7 include statements by individuals that are not testifying and\n8 the government argues that the defense can't attack the\n9 credibility of those non-testifying individuals because their\n10 statements would not be admitted for their truth but, for\n11 example, their effect on the testifying witness and the like.\n12 Again, I think without more specificity it is\n13 difficult to make a definitive ruling but I'm happy to hear\n14 examples to give some guidance.\n15 Ms. Moe?\n16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n17 I think there will be limited testimony from a victim\n18 about her interaction with other victims. I think the\n19 statements that would come in from those other victims would be\n20 offered not for their truth but because they are instructions,\n21 they would be offered for that effect on listener and to\n22 explain the course of events that followed. We don't\n23 anticipate offering any statements from non-testifying victims\n24 for their truth and so we don't anticipate opening the door to\n25 a line of cross-examination about their credibility. And so,\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007097",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 46 of 127",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LB15MAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MOE: But, beyond that, your Honor, we don't\n2 anticipate this would be an issue.\n3 THE COURT: OK. I think we are in agreement.\n4 My clerk noted I inadvertently skipped over Government\n5 so we will return to that. This is the government's\n6 expectation that the testimony of certain witnesses would\n7 include statements by individuals that are not testifying and\n8 the government argues that the defense can't attack the\n9 credibility of those non-testifying individuals because their\n10 statements would not be admitted for their truth but, for\n11 example, their effect on the testifying witness and the like.\n12 Again, I think without more specificity it is\n13 difficult to make a definitive ruling but I'm happy to hear\n14 examples to give some guidance.\n15 Ms. Moe?\n16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n17 I think there will be limited testimony from a victim\n18 about her interaction with other victims. I think the\n19 statements that would come in from those other victims would be\n20 offered not for their truth but because they are instructions,\n21 they would be offered for that effect on listener and to\n22 explain the course of events that followed. We don't\n23 anticipate offering any statements from non-testifying victims\n24 for their truth and so we don't anticipate opening the door to\n25 a line of cross-examination about their credibility. And so,",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007097",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007097"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}