mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007165.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "114",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 114 of 127 114 LB15max4 accurate? THE DEFENDANT: Oh sorry. Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Anything else on that, Ms. Moe? MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you. Just with respect to the second administrative item, the government has received the Court's order related to the Daubert hearing. Because the defense's Daubert briefing was focused on the question of grooming it would be helpful to understand the scope of the hearing and, in particular, whether the Court would like the government to present evidence with respect to the full scope of the expert's findings and conclusions that were addressed in the motions or whether the hearing would be focused on the question of grooming. THE COURT: I guess I think it goes to each of the proffered opinions being offered -- MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: -- in part because of overlap in those issues. I don't know that it's obvious to me how to separate them out at this point. MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. It is very helpful to know in advance of the hearing. THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, anything on that? MS. STERNHEIM: Yes, Judge. These, I guess you put them under the housekeeping category and I know tomorrow the government is to respond to a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 114 of 127 114",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LB15max4 accurate? THE DEFENDANT: Oh sorry. Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Anything else on that, Ms. Moe? MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you. Just with respect to the second administrative item, the government has received the Court's order related to the Daubert hearing. Because the defense's Daubert briefing was focused on the question of grooming it would be helpful to understand the scope of the hearing and, in particular, whether the Court would like the government to present evidence with respect to the full scope of the expert's findings and conclusions that were addressed in the motions or whether the hearing would be focused on the question of grooming. THE COURT: I guess I think it goes to each of the proffered opinions being offered -- MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: -- in part because of overlap in those issues. I don't know that it's obvious to me how to separate them out at this point. MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. It is very helpful to know in advance of the hearing. THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, anything on that? MS. STERNHEIM: Yes, Judge. These, I guess you put them under the housekeeping category and I know tomorrow the government is to respond to a",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Sternheim",
      "THE DEFENDANT"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21",
      "tomorrow"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007165"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}