DOJ-OGR-00007167.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "116",
  4. "document_number": "465",
  5. "date": "11/15/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 116 of 127 116 LB15max4\n1 Ms. Maxwell. Do you know anything about that?\n2 MS. MOE: Your Honor if I could have one moment?\n3 THE COURT: Sure.\n4 MS. MOE: Thank you.\n5 (Counsel conferring)\n6 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I don't have particular information about the series of disclosures we made last week and whether or not they've been processed by the MDC but we will certainly be conferring with the MDC in connection with a response to the defense's letter on Friday. Our understanding is that, generally, that drives have been received by MDC, processed through their warehouse, picked up by legal counsel and produced to the defense in regular time frame. I can't speak to any particular package that was mailed last week because I am hearing about it now for the first time.\n16 THE COURT: Well, OK. You will include in your letter -- I mean, I think at this point a week is too long. I think the representation in the prior letter was one to two days for legal mail, maybe this is different because this is different?\n21 MS. MOE: I don't believe so, your Honor. Part of the reason why I want to look into this and confer with my colleague is we are not quite sure whether the date was Monday or Wednesday that we produced this material to the defense and we want to just double-check the mailing date to make sure we\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007167",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 116 of 127 116 LB15max4",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 Ms. Maxwell. Do you know anything about that?\n2 MS. MOE: Your Honor if I could have one moment?\n3 THE COURT: Sure.\n4 MS. MOE: Thank you.\n5 (Counsel conferring)\n6 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I don't have particular information about the series of disclosures we made last week and whether or not they've been processed by the MDC but we will certainly be conferring with the MDC in connection with a response to the defense's letter on Friday. Our understanding is that, generally, that drives have been received by MDC, processed through their warehouse, picked up by legal counsel and produced to the defense in regular time frame. I can't speak to any particular package that was mailed last week because I am hearing about it now for the first time.\n16 THE COURT: Well, OK. You will include in your letter -- I mean, I think at this point a week is too long. I think the representation in the prior letter was one to two days for legal mail, maybe this is different because this is different?\n21 MS. MOE: I don't believe so, your Honor. Part of the reason why I want to look into this and confer with my colleague is we are not quite sure whether the date was Monday or Wednesday that we produced this material to the defense and we want to just double-check the mailing date to make sure we",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007167",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Maxwell",
  36. "Moe"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "MDC",
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "11/15/21",
  45. "Friday",
  46. "Monday",
  47. "Wednesday"
  48. ],
  49. "reference_numbers": [
  50. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  51. "Document 465",
  52. "DOJ-OGR-00007167"
  53. ]
  54. },
  55. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  56. }