mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007249.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "70",
    "document_number": "467",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 70 of 158 70 LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Direct literature compare to your clinical practice and your forensic practice with respect to the question of individuals with particular vulnerabilities being at higher risk of childhood sexual abuse? A. It's highly consistent. Q. The defense has argued that a victim's prior sexual behavior is relevant to the concept of grooming. What's your reaction to that? A. In what way? I mean, I've talked about, certainly their experiences of victimization can make them more vulnerable, but I'm not sure what you mean. Q. Does whether a person, whether or not a person has had sexual experience, putting aside prior victimization, make them more or less vulnerable to being groomed? A. I'm not aware of any literature on that issue, nor do I even understand how that would theoretically make sense. To the extent that you're suggesting that somebody who has been sexually active in the past can or cannot be groomed, I'm not, even theoretically, I don't understand why that would be the case. But, no, certainly I don't believe that there is any literature that would support that statement. THE COURT: So to the extent you've seen in your practice and studies the impact of prior sexual conduct on the phenomenon of grooming, you understand it to potentially SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007249",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 70 of 158 70",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "literature compare to your clinical practice and your forensic practice with respect to the question of individuals with particular vulnerabilities being at higher risk of childhood sexual abuse? A. It's highly consistent. Q. The defense has argued that a victim's prior sexual behavior is relevant to the concept of grooming. What's your reaction to that? A. In what way? I mean, I've talked about, certainly their experiences of victimization can make them more vulnerable, but I'm not sure what you mean. Q. Does whether a person, whether or not a person has had sexual experience, putting aside prior victimization, make them more or less vulnerable to being groomed? A. I'm not aware of any literature on that issue, nor do I even understand how that would theoretically make sense. To the extent that you're suggesting that somebody who has been sexually active in the past can or cannot be groomed, I'm not, even theoretically, I don't understand why that would be the case. But, no, certainly I don't believe that there is any literature that would support that statement. THE COURT: So to the extent you've seen in your practice and studies the impact of prior sexual conduct on the phenomenon of grooming, you understand it to potentially",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007249",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "467",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007249"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}