mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007277.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "98",
    "document_number": "467",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 98 of 158 98 LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross provided to Dr. Rocchio. MR. PAGLIUCA: Do you need a response from me, your Honor? THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, your Honor, I understand Jencks Act production, but this is a separate issue. She relied on this in preparation for her testimony today, and I believe that under Rule 16 I am allowed to examine whatever she relied on in anticipation and preparation for her testimony here today. This would be part of the bases for her opinion, your Honor. THE COURT: Well, I don't know if it is. Notes that have a subject heading \"grooming,\" for example, that she threw away which are not in the file are not a bases for her opinion. So I don't know that the whole file is subject to that theory. The contract between her and the government is not a basis for opinion, but you've asked for that since she's included that in the file. MR. PAGLIUCA: I have that, your Honor. THE COURT: Right. But you see the point. MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand. But I don't know what is in her file, is my point. THE COURT: Right. Well, so then the question, I think, is: What is in your file that forms the basis for your opinion? That will get us to where we need to get. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007277",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 98 of 158 98 LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "provided to Dr. Rocchio. MR. PAGLIUCA: Do you need a response from me, your Honor? THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, your Honor, I understand Jencks Act production, but this is a separate issue. She relied on this in preparation for her testimony today, and I believe that under Rule 16 I am allowed to examine whatever she relied on in anticipation and preparation for her testimony here today. This would be part of the bases for her opinion, your Honor. THE COURT: Well, I don't know if it is. Notes that have a subject heading \"grooming,\" for example, that she threw away which are not in the file are not a bases for her opinion. So I don't know that the whole file is subject to that theory. The contract between her and the government is not a basis for opinion, but you've asked for that since she's included that in the file. MR. PAGLIUCA: I have that, your Honor. THE COURT: Right. But you see the point. MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand. But I don't know what is in her file, is my point. THE COURT: Right. Well, so then the question, I think, is: What is in your file that forms the basis for your opinion? That will get us to where we need to get.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007277",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Rocchio",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "467",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007277"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}