mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007304.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "125",
    "document_number": "467",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 125 of 158 125 LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross\n\n1 Q. And that is explaining the experience from the point of view of the subject; right?\n2\n3 A. Yes.\n4\n5 Q. And then they talk about why they're doing this study and it's to collect data to define a new term created by an advocacy group.\n6\n7 Do you see that?\n8 A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the question.\n9\n10 Q. Under method --\n11\n12 A. Yes.\n13 -- it says that this study is this phenomenological study, it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an advocacy group.\n14\n15 Do you see that?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. So that's what's being undertaken here, is this subjective study to determine this term created by an advocacy group in this study; right?\n18\n19\n20 A. I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by an advocacy group.\n21\n22\n23\n24 Q. If you go down to the second part here, it says, \"All experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 125 of 158 125 LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. And that is explaining the experience from the point of view of the subject; right?\n\n3 A. Yes.\n\n4 Q. And then they talk about why they're doing this study and it's to collect data to define a new term created by an advocacy group.\n\n7 Do you see that?\n\n8 A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the question.\n\n9 Q. Under method --\n\n10 A. Yes.\n\n11 Q. -- it says that this study is this phenomenological study, it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an advocacy group.\n\n15 Do you see that?\n\n16 A. Yes.\n\n17 Q. So that's what's being undertaken here, is this subjective study to determine this term created by an advocacy group in this study; right?\n\n20 A. I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by an advocacy group.\n\n24 Q. If you go down to the second part here, it says, \"All experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "467"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}