DOJ-OGR-00007402.json 5.1 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "488",
  5. "date": "11/22/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 488 Filed 11/22/21 Page 2 of 6\nPage 2\nFor the reasons set forth below, the birth certificates are self-authenticating under Rule 902 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and no records custodian should be required to testify. The exhibits should be determined to be self-authenticating.\nI. Applicable Law\nRule 902 contains a list of items that are “self-authenticating,” that is “they require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted.” Fed. R. Evid. 902. Under Rule 902(4), that list includes:\nCertified Copies of Public Records. A copy of an official record — or a copy of a document that was recorded or filed in a public office as authorized by law — if the copy is certified as correct by:\n(A) the custodian or another person authorized to make the certification; or\n(B) a certificate that complies with Rule 902(1), (2), or (3), a federal statute, or a rule prescribed by the Supreme Court.\nRule 902(1), in turn, provides for self-authentication of the following:\nDomestic Public Documents That Are Sealed and Signed. A document that bears:\n(A) a seal purporting to be that of the United States; any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession of the United States; the former Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; a political subdivision of any of these entities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity named above; and\n(B) a signature purporting to be an execution or attestation.\nFinally, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 27 permits a party to “prove an official record in the same manner as in a civil action.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1), in turn, permits proof of a domestic “official record” that is “otherwise admissible and is kept within the United States, any state, district, or commonwealth, or any territory” through\nDOJ-OGR-00007402",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 488 Filed 11/22/21 Page 2 of 6",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Page 2",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "For the reasons set forth below, the birth certificates are self-authenticating under Rule 902 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and no records custodian should be required to testify. The exhibits should be determined to be self-authenticating.",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "I. Applicable Law\nRule 902 contains a list of items that are “self-authenticating,” that is “they require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted.” Fed. R. Evid. 902. Under Rule 902(4), that list includes:\nCertified Copies of Public Records. A copy of an official record — or a copy of a document that was recorded or filed in a public office as authorized by law — if the copy is certified as correct by:\n(A) the custodian or another person authorized to make the certification; or\n(B) a certificate that complies with Rule 902(1), (2), or (3), a federal statute, or a rule prescribed by the Supreme Court.\nRule 902(1), in turn, provides for self-authentication of the following:\nDomestic Public Documents That Are Sealed and Signed. A document that bears:\n(A) a seal purporting to be that of the United States; any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession of the United States; the former Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; a political subdivision of any of these entities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity named above; and\n(B) a signature purporting to be an execution or attestation.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Finally, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 27 permits a party to “prove an official record in the same manner as in a civil action.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1), in turn, permits proof of a domestic “official record” that is “otherwise admissible and is kept within the United States, any state, district, or commonwealth, or any territory” through",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007402",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "Supreme Court",
  47. "United States"
  48. ],
  49. "locations": [
  50. "United States",
  51. "Panama Canal Zone",
  52. "Pacific Islands"
  53. ],
  54. "dates": [
  55. "11/22/21"
  56. ],
  57. "reference_numbers": [
  58. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  59. "488",
  60. "902",
  61. "902(4)",
  62. "902(1)",
  63. "902(1), (2), or (3)",
  64. "27",
  65. "44(a)(1)",
  66. "DOJ-OGR-00007402"
  67. ]
  68. },
  69. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the authentication of birth certificates as evidence. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is page 2 of 6."
  70. }