DOJ-OGR-00007412.json 4.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "491",
  5. "date": "11/22/21",
  6. "document_type": "Letter",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": true
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 491 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 21, 2021 BY E-MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in reply to the defendant's motion to exclude Government Exhibit 52. (See Dkt. No. 476). The Court ordered the Government to respond in particular to the defendant's argument that \"Employee-1 cannot authenticate Government Exhibit 52 because Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee, purportedly removed the document from the property before Employee-1 began working for Mr. Epstein.\" (Id.) The Second Circuit has \"often commented that the bar for authentication of evidence is not particularly high.\" United States v. Al-Moyad, 545 F.3d 139, 172 (2d Cir. 2008) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). The \"proponent of the evidence is not required to rule out all possibilities inconsistent with authenticity, or to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence is what it purports to be.\" United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 658 (2d Cir. 2001). All that is required is \"sufficient proof . . . so that a reasonable juror could find in favor of authenticity or 1 DOJ-OGR-00007412",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 491 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 6",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 21, 2021",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "BY E-MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in reply to the defendant's motion to exclude Government Exhibit 52. (See Dkt. No. 476). The Court ordered the Government to respond in particular to the defendant's argument that \"Employee-1 cannot authenticate Government Exhibit 52 because Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee, purportedly removed the document from the property before Employee-1 began working for Mr. Epstein.\" (Id.) The Second Circuit has \"often commented that the bar for authentication of evidence is not particularly high.\" United States v. Al-Moyad, 545 F.3d 139, 172 (2d Cir. 2008) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). The \"proponent of the evidence is not required to rule out all possibilities inconsistent with authenticity, or to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence is what it purports to be.\" United States v. Dhinsa, 243 F.3d 635, 658 (2d Cir. 2001). All that is required is \"sufficient proof . . . so that a reasonable juror could find in favor of authenticity or",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "1",
  35. "position": "bottom"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "stamp",
  39. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007412",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. }
  42. ],
  43. "entities": {
  44. "people": [
  45. "Alison J. Nathan",
  46. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  47. "Mr. Rodriguez",
  48. "Mr. Epstein",
  49. "Employee-1"
  50. ],
  51. "organizations": [
  52. "U.S. Department of Justice",
  53. "United States Attorney",
  54. "United States District Court",
  55. "Second Circuit"
  56. ],
  57. "locations": [
  58. "New York"
  59. ],
  60. "dates": [
  61. "November 21, 2021",
  62. "11/22/21"
  63. ],
  64. "reference_numbers": [
  65. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  66. "Document 491",
  67. "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
  68. "Dkt. No. 476",
  69. "DOJ-OGR-00007412"
  70. ]
  71. },
  72. "additional_notes": "The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the Honorable Alison J. Nathan, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter discusses the authentication of Government Exhibit 52 and cites relevant case law. The document is stamped with a reference number DOJ-OGR-00007412."
  73. }