mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007467.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 28",
    "document_number": "499",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499 Filed 11/23/21 Page 2 of 28\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................ii\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT...............................1\nARGUMENT ....................................................................2\nI. Dr. Dietz's Testimony is Admissible. ...........................................3\nA. Response to Dr. Rocchio's Proposed Testimony...............................4\nB. Hindsight Bias...........................................................8\nC. The Halo Effect...........................................................9\nD. Pathways to False Allegations of Sexual Assault. ............................11\nE. Dr. Dietz's Alleged Opinions about the Accusers' \"Credibility.\" ................13\nF. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. ..............................................15\nII. Dr. Loftus's Testimony is Admissible...........................................16\nCONCLUSION ..................................................................22\nCertificate of Service............................................................24\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00007467",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499 Filed 11/23/21 Page 2 of 28",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................ii\nINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT...............................1\nARGUMENT ....................................................................2\nI. Dr. Dietz's Testimony is Admissible. ...........................................3\nA. Response to Dr. Rocchio's Proposed Testimony...............................4\nB. Hindsight Bias...........................................................8\nC. The Halo Effect...........................................................9\nD. Pathways to False Allegations of Sexual Assault. ............................11\nE. Dr. Dietz's Alleged Opinions about the Accusers' \"Credibility.\" ................13\nF. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. ..............................................15\nII. Dr. Loftus's Testimony is Admissible...........................................16\nCONCLUSION ..................................................................22\nCertificate of Service............................................................24",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007467",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Dietz",
      "Dr. Rocchio",
      "Dr. Loftus"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007467"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document discusses the admissibility of testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
}