DOJ-OGR-00007520.json 5.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "27",
  4. "document_number": "499-1",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 27 of 375\n\nLoftus, E.F. & Burns, T.E. (1982). Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia. Memory and Cognition, 10, 318-323.\nLoftus, E.F. & Severance, L.J. (1982). Improving jury instructions. Washington State Bar Journal, July, 16-19.\nGreene, E. & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Eyewitness testimony: Constructive processes in human memory. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 1). Villanova, PA: ProScientia, Inc.\nLoftus, E.F. & Beach, L.R. (1982). Human inference and judgment: Is the glass half empty or half full? Stanford Law Review, 34, 901-918.\n\n1983\nLoftus, E.F. (1983). Misfortunes of memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. London, 302, 413-421.\nLoftus, E.F. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 38, 564-572.\nLoftus, E.F. (1983). Whose shadow is crooked? American Psychologist, 38, 576-577.\nLoftus, E.F. & Marburger, W. (1983). Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, did anyone beat you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmark events. Memory and Cognition, 11, 114-120.\nLoftus, E.F., Manber, M., & Keating, J.P. (1983). Recollection of naturalistic events: Context enhancement versus negative cueing. Human Learning, 2, 83-92.\nLoftus, E.F., Ketcham, K.E. (1983). The malleability of eyewitness accounts. In S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating Witness Evidence (pp. 157-172). London: Wiley.\nLoftus, E.F. (1983). Memory. The World Book Encyclopedia (Vol. 13, pp. 318-320). Chicago: World Book, Inc.\nKeating, J.P., Loftus, E.F., & Manber, M. (1983). Emergency evaluations during fires: Psychological considerations. In R.F. Kidd & M. J. Saks (Eds.), Advances in Applied Social Psychology (Vol 2. pp. 83-99). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.\nLoftus, E.F., Goodman, J., & Nagatkin, C. (1983). Examining witnesses-good advice and bad. In R.J. Matlon & R.J. Crawford (Eds.), Communication Strategies in the Practice of Lawyering (pp. 292-317). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.\nLoftus, E.F. & Greene, E. (1983). Review of \"Reconstructing reality in the courtroom.\" Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 315-328.\n\n1984\nHall, D.F. & Loftus, E.F. (1984). The fate of memory: Discoverable or doomed? In N. Butters & L. Squire (Eds.), Neuropsychology of Memory (pp. 25-32). NY: Guilford Press.\nGreene, E. & Loftus, E.F. (1984). What's new in the news? The influence of well publicized news events on psychological research and courtroom trials. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 211-221.\nSeverance, L.J. & Loftus, E.F. (1984). Improving criminal justice: Making jury instructions understandable for American jurors. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 97-119.\nLoftus, E.F., Loftus, G.R., & Hunt, E.B. (1984). Broadbent's Maltese cross memory model: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something missing. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 73-74.\nSeverance, L., Greene, E., & Loftus, E.F. (1984). Toward criminal jury instructions that jurors can understand. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 198-233.\nLoftus, E.F. & Davies, G.M. (1984). Distortions in the memory of children. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 51-67.\nGoodman, J. & Loftus, E.F. (1984). Social science looks at witness examination. Trial, 20, 52-57.\nLoftus, E.F. (1984). Eyewitnesses: Essential but unreliable. Psychology Today, 18 (Feb.), 22-26.\nWells, G.L. & Loftus, E.F. (1984). Eyewitness research: Then and now. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 1-11). NY: Cambridge University Press.\nHall, D.F., Loftus, E.F., & Tousignant, J.P. (1984). Post-event information and changes in recollection for a natural event. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 124-141). NY: Cambridge University Press.\nLoftus, E.F. (1984). Expert testimony on the eyewitness. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives. NY: Cambridge University Press, 273-282.\n12\nDOJ-OGR-00007520",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 27 of 375",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "The list of references",
  20. "position": "middle"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "12",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007520",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Loftus, E.F.",
  36. "Burns, T.E.",
  37. "Severance, L.J.",
  38. "Greene, E.",
  39. "Beach, L.R.",
  40. "Marburger, W.",
  41. "Manber, M.",
  42. "Keating, J.P.",
  43. "Ketcham, K.E.",
  44. "Goodman, J.",
  45. "Nagatkin, C.",
  46. "Hall, D.F.",
  47. "Loftus, G.R.",
  48. "Hunt, E.B.",
  49. "Davies, G.M.",
  50. "Goodman, J.",
  51. "Wells, G.L.",
  52. "Tousignant, J.P."
  53. ],
  54. "organizations": [
  55. "ProScientia, Inc.",
  56. "Royal Society",
  57. "American Psychologist",
  58. "Wiley",
  59. "World Book, Inc.",
  60. "Erlbaum",
  61. "Speech Communication Association",
  62. "Guilford Press",
  63. "Cambridge University Press"
  64. ],
  65. "locations": [
  66. "Villanova, PA",
  67. "London",
  68. "Hillsdale",
  69. "Annandale, VA",
  70. "NY"
  71. ],
  72. "dates": [
  73. "1982",
  74. "1983",
  75. "1984",
  76. "11/23/21",
  77. "July"
  78. ],
  79. "reference_numbers": [
  80. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  81. "499-1",
  82. "DOJ-OGR-00007520"
  83. ]
  84. },
  85. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of references related to eyewitness testimony and memory. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
  86. }