mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007522.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "29",
    "document_number": "499-1",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 29 of 375\n\n1986\nSchooler, J.W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 171-181.\nTousignant, J.P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading post-event information. Memory and Cognition, 14, 329-338.\nSchooler, J. & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Individual differences and experimentation: Complementary approaches to interrogative suggestibility. Social Behaviour, 1, 105-112.\nLoftus, E.F. & Leber, D. (1986). Do jurors talk? Trial, 22, 59-60.\nLoftus, E.F. (1986). Ten years in the life of an expert witness. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 241-263. (Presidential Address, Div 41, APA).\nFranklin, K.C. & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Law errs in assumptions about memory. Syllabus (An American Bar Assn. Journal), March, 17, 7.\nWilson, L., Greene, E., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Beliefs about forensic hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 110-121.\nLoftus, E.F. (1986). Experimental psychologist as advocate or impartial educator. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 63-78.\nCaddy, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Forensic Practice. In G. S. Tryon (Ed.) The Professional Practice of Psychology. p 130-159. New Jersey: Norwood.\n\n1987\nLoftus, E.F., Loftus, G.R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about weapon focus. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55-62.\nLoftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W., Boone, S.M., & Kline, D. (1987). Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 3-13.\nCole, C.B. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). The memory of children. In S. Ceci, M. Toglia, & D. Ross (Eds.), Children's Eyewitness Memory (pp. 178-208). NY: Springer-Verlag.\nSchooler, J.W. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Memory. In Encyclopedia of Science and Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 584-587). NY: McGraw-Hill.\nLoftus, E.F., Banaji, M.R., Schooler, J.W., & Foster, R.A. (1987). Who remembers what? Gender differences in memory. Michigan Quarterly Review, 26, 64-85.\nHall, D.F., McFeaters, S.J., & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Alterations in recollection of unusual and unexpected events. Journal of the Society for Scientific Exploration, 1, 3-10.\nLoftus, E.F. & Schneider, N.G. (1987). Challenging eyewitness testimony. Trial, 23, 40-44.\nGoodman, J. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). How to play to the jury you select--in complex and other cases. Criminal Justice, 2 (Spring), 2-5, 42-43.\nChristianson, S. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-239.\nLoftus, E.F. (1987). Trials of an Expert Witness. Newsweek (My Turn Column), June 29, 10-11.\nLoftus, E.F. & Schneider, N.G. (1987). Behold with strange surprise: Judicial reactions to expert testimony concerning eyewitness testimony. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 56, 1-45. (Based on Annual Joseph Cohen Lectureship).\nReprinted in Criminal Practice Law Review (1988), 1, 1-51.\nLoftus, E.F. (1987). Psychology and law. In F. Farley & C.H. Null (Eds.), Using Psychological Science: Making the Public Case (pp. 69-78). Washington, D.C.: Federation of Behavioral Psychological Cognitive Sciences.\nLoftus, E.F. (1987) Eyewitness testimony and event perception. University of Bridgeport Law Review, 8, 7-13.\n\n1988\nLoftus, E.F. & Doyle, J.M. (1988). Eyewitness Testimony: Civil and Criminal, 1988 Supplement. Kluwer Law Books, 1-37.\nBell, B. & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192.\nSchooler, J.W., Foster, R.A., & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection. Memory and Cognition, 16, 243-251.\n14\nDOJ-OGR-00007522",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 29 of 375",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1986\nSchooler, J.W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 171-181.\nTousignant, J.P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading post-event information. Memory and Cognition, 14, 329-338.\nSchooler, J. & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Individual differences and experimentation: Complementary approaches to interrogative suggestibility. Social Behaviour, 1, 105-112.\nLoftus, E.F. & Leber, D. (1986). Do jurors talk? Trial, 22, 59-60.\nLoftus, E.F. (1986). Ten years in the life of an expert witness. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 241-263. (Presidential Address, Div 41, APA).\nFranklin, K.C. & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Law errs in assumptions about memory. Syllabus (An American Bar Assn. Journal), March, 17, 7.\nWilson, L., Greene, E., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Beliefs about forensic hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 110-121.\nLoftus, E.F. (1986). Experimental psychologist as advocate or impartial educator. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 63-78.\nCaddy, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Forensic Practice. In G. S. Tryon (Ed.) The Professional Practice of Psychology. p 130-159. New Jersey: Norwood.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1987\nLoftus, E.F., Loftus, G.R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about weapon focus. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55-62.\nLoftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W., Boone, S.M., & Kline, D. (1987). Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 3-13.\nCole, C.B. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). The memory of children. In S. Ceci, M. Toglia, & D. Ross (Eds.), Children's Eyewitness Memory (pp. 178-208). NY: Springer-Verlag.\nSchooler, J.W. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Memory. In Encyclopedia of Science and Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 584-587). NY: McGraw-Hill.\nLoftus, E.F., Banaji, M.R., Schooler, J.W., & Foster, R.A. (1987). Who remembers what? Gender differences in memory. Michigan Quarterly Review, 26, 64-85.\nHall, D.F., McFeaters, S.J., & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Alterations in recollection of unusual and unexpected events. Journal of the Society for Scientific Exploration, 1, 3-10.\nLoftus, E.F. & Schneider, N.G. (1987). Challenging eyewitness testimony. Trial, 23, 40-44.\nGoodman, J. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). How to play to the jury you select--in complex and other cases. Criminal Justice, 2 (Spring), 2-5, 42-43.\nChristianson, S. & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-239.\nLoftus, E.F. (1987). Trials of an Expert Witness. Newsweek (My Turn Column), June 29, 10-11.\nLoftus, E.F. & Schneider, N.G. (1987). Behold with strange surprise: Judicial reactions to expert testimony concerning eyewitness testimony. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 56, 1-45. (Based on Annual Joseph Cohen Lectureship).\nReprinted in Criminal Practice Law Review (1988), 1, 1-51.\nLoftus, E.F. (1987). Psychology and law. In F. Farley & C.H. Null (Eds.), Using Psychological Science: Making the Public Case (pp. 69-78). Washington, D.C.: Federation of Behavioral Psychological Cognitive Sciences.\nLoftus, E.F. (1987) Eyewitness testimony and event perception. University of Bridgeport Law Review, 8, 7-13.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1988\nLoftus, E.F. & Doyle, J.M. (1988). Eyewitness Testimony: Civil and Criminal, 1988 Supplement. Kluwer Law Books, 1-37.\nBell, B. & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192.\nSchooler, J.W., Foster, R.A., & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection. Memory and Cognition, 16, 243-251.",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "14",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007522",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Schooler, J.W.",
      "Gerhard, D.",
      "Loftus, E.F.",
      "Tousignant, J.P.",
      "Hall, D.",
      "Leber, D.",
      "Franklin, K.C.",
      "Wilson, L.",
      "Greene, E.",
      "Caddy, G. R.",
      "G. S. Tryon",
      "Loftus, G.R.",
      "Messo, J.",
      "Boone, S.M.",
      "Kline, D.",
      "Cole, C.B.",
      "S. Ceci",
      "M. Toglia",
      "D. Ross",
      "Banaji, M.R.",
      "Foster, R.A.",
      "McFeaters, S.J.",
      "Schneider, N.G.",
      "Goodman, J.",
      "Christianson, S.",
      "F. Farley",
      "C.H. Null",
      "Doyle, J.M.",
      "Bell, B."
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "American Psychological Association",
      "American Bar Association",
      "Springer-Verlag",
      "McGraw-Hill",
      "Kluwer Law Books",
      "Federation of Behavioral Psychological Cognitive Sciences",
      "University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review",
      "Criminal Practice Law Review",
      "University of Bridgeport Law Review",
      "Journal of Experimental Psychology",
      "Memory and Cognition",
      "Law and Human Behavior",
      "Trial",
      "Syllabus",
      "International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis",
      "Social Behaviour",
      "Michigan Quarterly Review",
      "Journal of the Society for Scientific Exploration",
      "Newsweek",
      "Journal of Applied Social Psychology"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Jersey",
      "NY",
      "Washington, D.C."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "1986",
      "1987",
      "1988",
      "11/23/21",
      "March 17, 7",
      "June 29"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007522"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of references related to eyewitness testimony and memory. The text is well-formatted and easy to read. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}