DOJ-OGR-00007537.json 6.3 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "44",
  4. "document_number": "499-1",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "Case document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 44 of 375\n\nNelson, K.J., Laney, C., Bowman-Fowler, N.,Knowles, E., Davis, D., & Loftus, E.F. (2011) Change blindness can cause mistaken eyewitness identification. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 16, 62-74.\nKaasa, S.O., Morris, E.K.., & Loftus, E.F. (2011) Remembering Why: Can people consistently recall reasons for their behavior? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25, 35-42.\nLoftus, E. F. (2011) Intelligence gathering post 9/11. American Psychologist. 66,, 532-541.\nFrenda, S.J., Nichols, R.M., & Loftus, E.F. (2011) Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 20-23.\nLoftus, E. F. (2011) Crimes of Memory: False Memories and Societal Justice. In M.A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds). Psychology and the Real World: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. pp. 83-88. New York: Worth Publishers.\nNewman, E.J., Berkowitz, S.R., Nelson, K.J., Garry, M., & Loftus, E.F. (2011) Attitudes about memory dampening drugs depend on context and country. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 675-681.\nMantonakis, A., Bernstein, D.M., & Loftus, E.F. (2011). Attributions of Fluency: Familiarity, Preference, and the Senses. In P.A. Higham & J.P. Leboe (Eds). Constructions of Remembering and Metacognition. Essays in Honour of Bruce Whittlesea,. Hampshire, England: Palgrave MacMillan, p 40-50.\nLaney, C., & Loftus, E. (2011). Eyewitness Testimony. Oxford Bibliographies Online: Criminology. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0086\nLoftus, E.F. (2011) How I got started: From semantic memory to expert testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25, 347-348.\nLoftus, E.F. (2011, March 5-6) In the Memory Palace. (Review of J. Foer, Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything). Wall Street Journal. p C8.\nLoftus, E.F.& Geis, G. (2011) Collaborating to deter potential public enemies: Social science and the law. Univ of California- Irvine Law Review, 1, 175-186.\nBernstein, D.M., Pernat, N., & Loftus, E.F. (2011). The false memory diet: False memories alter food preference. In V.R. Preedy, R.R. Watson, & C.R. Martin (Eds.). Handbook of behavior, food, and nutrition. New York: Springer (pp. 1645-1663). DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3 107.\nLoftus, E.F. (2011, September 1) The risk of ill-informed juries. New York Times (Editorial)\nLoftus, E.F., Doyle, J.M., & Dysart, J.E. (2011) Eyewitness testimony: Civil & Criminal. 2011 Cumulative Supplement, p 1-37. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law Publishing,\n\n2012\nZhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E.F., He, Q., Chen, C., Lei, X., Lin, C., & Dong, Q. (2012) Brief exposure to misinformation can lead to long-term false memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 301-307.\nNewman, E.J. & Loftus, E.F. (2012) Clarkian Logic on Trial. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 260-263.\nDavis, D. & Loftus, E.F. (2012). Inconsistencies Between Law and the Limits of Human Cognition: The Case of Eyewitness Identification. In Nadel, L. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W.P. (Eds) Memory and Law. NY: Oxford Univ. Press., p 29-58\nFoster, J.L., Huthwaite, T., Yesberg, J.A., Garry, M., & Loftus, E.F. (2012) Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses. Acta Psychologica. 139, 320-326.\nDavis, D. & Loftus, E.F. (2012) The dangers of eyewitnesses for the innocent: Learning from the past and projecting into the age of social media. New England Law Review. 46, 769-809.\nNewman, E.J. & Loftus, E.F. (2012) Updating Ebbinghaus on the Science of Memory, Europe's Journal of Psychology. 8, 209-216.\nFoster, J.L., Garry, M.,& Loftus, E.F. (2012) Repeated information in the courtroom. Court Review, 48, 45-47.\nLoftus, E.F. & Newman, E.J.(2012, December 23). The malleability of memory. U-T San Diego, p. B2\n\n2013\nFrenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W. & Loftus, E.F. (2013) False memories of fabricated political events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 280-286.\nSchacter, D.L. & Loftus, E.F. (2013) Memory and Law: What can Cognitive Neuroscience contribute? Nature Neuroscience. 16 (2), 119-123.\n\n29\nDOJ-OGR-00007537",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 44 of 375",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "The rest of the text is a list of references in a academic paper, spanning multiple years (2011-2013).",
  20. "position": "body"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "29",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007537",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Nelson, K.J.",
  36. "Laney, C.",
  37. "Bowman-Fowler, N.",
  38. "Knowles, E.",
  39. "Davis, D.",
  40. "Loftus, E.F.",
  41. "Kaasa, S.O.",
  42. "Morris, E.K.",
  43. "Frenda, S.J.",
  44. "Nichols, R.M.",
  45. "Newman, E.J.",
  46. "Berkowitz, S.R.",
  47. "Garry, M.",
  48. "Mantonakis, A.",
  49. "Bernstein, D.M.",
  50. "Pernat, N.",
  51. "Geis, G.",
  52. "Doyle, J.M.",
  53. "Dysart, J.E.",
  54. "Zhu, B.",
  55. "Chen, C.",
  56. "He, Q.",
  57. "Lei, X.",
  58. "Lin, C.",
  59. "Dong, Q.",
  60. "Huthwaite, T.",
  61. "Yesberg, J.A.",
  62. "Saletan, W.",
  63. "Schacter, D.L."
  64. ],
  65. "organizations": [
  66. "Oxford Univ. Press",
  67. "Lexis Law Publishing",
  68. "New York Times",
  69. "Wall Street Journal",
  70. "U-T San Diego"
  71. ],
  72. "locations": [
  73. "New York",
  74. "Hampshire, England",
  75. "Charlottesville, VA",
  76. "San Diego"
  77. ],
  78. "dates": [
  79. "2011",
  80. "March 5-6, 2011",
  81. "September 1, 2011",
  82. "2012",
  83. "December 23, 2012",
  84. "2013"
  85. ],
  86. "reference_numbers": [
  87. "DOJ-OGR-00007537",
  88. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  89. "499-1"
  90. ]
  91. },
  92. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a page from a legal case document, containing a list of academic references related to the topic of eyewitness testimony and memory. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
  93. }