| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "322",
- "document_number": "499-1",
- "date": "11/23/21",
- "document_type": "publications list",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 322 of 375\n\nPUBLICATIONS\n\nBooks\nThe Law School Experience: Law, Legal Reasoning, and Lawyering (with Lissa Griffin) (2000)\nTrial Error and Misconduct (2d ed. 2007) (supplemented annually)\nProsecutorial Misconduct (2d ed. 1999) (supplemented annually)\nTrial Error and Misconduct (1997) (supplemented annually)\nProsecutorial Misconduct (1985)\n\nBook Chapter\nThe Prosecutor's Contribution to Wrongful Convictions, J. Acker et al., Examining Wrongful Convictions - Moving Back, Stepping Forward (Carolina Academic Press 2014).\n\nLaw Review Articles\nThreats and Bullying by Prosecutors, 46 Loyola University Law Review327 (2014)\nSubverting Brady v. Maryland and Denying a Fair Trial: Studying the Schuelke Report, 64 Mercer Law Review 683 (2013).\nPre-Plea Disclosure of Impeachment Evidence, 65 Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc 141 (2012).\nEducating Prosecutors, and Supreme Court Justices, on Brady v. Maryland, 13 Loyola New Orleans Public Interest Law Journal 517 (2012).\nJudicial Interference with Effective Assistance of Counsel, 31 Pace Law Review 560 (2011)\nProsecutorial Decision-Making and Discretion in Charging Decision, 62 Hastings Law Journal 1259 (2011)\nThe Zealous Prosecutor as Minister of Justice, 48 San Diego Law Review 151 (2011)\n\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00007815",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 322 of 375",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "PUBLICATIONS",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Books\nThe Law School Experience: Law, Legal Reasoning, and Lawyering (with Lissa Griffin) (2000)\nTrial Error and Misconduct (2d ed. 2007) (supplemented annually)\nProsecutorial Misconduct (2d ed. 1999) (supplemented annually)\nTrial Error and Misconduct (1997) (supplemented annually)\nProsecutorial Misconduct (1985)",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Book Chapter\nThe Prosecutor's Contribution to Wrongful Convictions, J. Acker et al., Examining Wrongful Convictions - Moving Back, Stepping Forward (Carolina Academic Press 2014).",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Law Review Articles\nThreats and Bullying by Prosecutors, 46 Loyola University Law Review327 (2014)\nSubverting Brady v. Maryland and Denying a Fair Trial: Studying the Schuelke Report, 64 Mercer Law Review 683 (2013).\nPre-Plea Disclosure of Impeachment Evidence, 65 Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc 141 (2012).\nEducating Prosecutors, and Supreme Court Justices, on Brady v. Maryland, 13 Loyola New Orleans Public Interest Law Journal 517 (2012).\nJudicial Interference with Effective Assistance of Counsel, 31 Pace Law Review 560 (2011)\nProsecutorial Decision-Making and Discretion in Charging Decision, 62 Hastings Law Journal 1259 (2011)\nThe Zealous Prosecutor as Minister of Justice, 48 San Diego Law Review 151 (2011)",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "2",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007815",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Lissa Griffin",
- "J. Acker"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Loyola University",
- "Mercer Law Review",
- "Vanderbilt Law Review",
- "Loyola New Orleans Public Interest Law Journal",
- "Pace Law Review",
- "Hastings Law Journal",
- "San Diego Law Review",
- "Carolina Academic Press"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "2000",
- "2007",
- "1999",
- "1997",
- "1985",
- "2014",
- "2013",
- "2012",
- "2011"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "499-1",
- "DOJ-OGR-00007815"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a list of publications, likely from a legal or academic context. The text is clear and well-formatted, with no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|