DOJ-OGR-00007853.json 9.0 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "360 of 375",
  4. "document_number": "499-1",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 360 of 375 LaPorte CV (Version 2020.3) Page 7 of 19 5. Wagstaff, I. and LaPorte, G. The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Forensic Sciences. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://www.nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/importance-of-diversity-and-inclusion-in-forensic-sciences.aspx. 6. LaPorte, G. Wrongful Convictions and DNA Exonerations: Understanding the Role of Forensic Science. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/wrongful-convictions-and-dna-exonerations.aspx. 7. Waltke, H., LaPorte, G., Weiss, D., Schwarting, D., Nguyen, M. and Scott, F. Sexual Assault Cases: Exploring the Importance of Non-DNA Forensic Evidence. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/non-dna-evidence-in-sexual-assault-cases.aspx. 8. Dutton, G. LaPorte G., Wagstaff, I. and Spivak, Cultivating the Next Generation of Forensic Scientists Through Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Journal of Forensic Research 2017,8:4; DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.10000384. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/cultivating-the-next-generation-of-forensic-scientists-through-science technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-2157-7145-1000384.pdf 9. Gresham, K., LaPorte, G., Montgomery, B. and Weiss, D. Using Innovative Technology to Investigate Targeted Mass Violence: What the Future Holds (May 2017) http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/using-innovative-technology/#sthash.bPcOad34.dpuf. 10. Jones, N., & LaPorte, G. (Eds.) (2017). 2017 National Institute of Justice Forensic Science Research and Development Symposium. (RTI Press Publication No. CP-0004-1705). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. DOI: 10.3768/rtipress.2017.cp.0004.1705. 11. LaPorte, GM. (2015) Chemical analysis for the scientific examination of questioned documents, in Forensic Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications (ed J. A. Siegel), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781118897768.ch8. 12. Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence. Biological Evidence Preservation: Considerations for Policy Makers (April 2015) (http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2015/NIST.IR.8048.pdf). 13. Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook: Best Practice for Evidence Handlers. April 2013 (http://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/BiologicalEvidencePreservationHandbook.pdf) 14. Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. February, 2012 (http://nij.gov/pubs-sum/latent-print-human-factors.htm). 15. Houlgrave, S., LaPorte, G., & Stephens, J. The Classification of Inkjet Inks Using AccuTOF TM DART TM (Direct Analysis in Real Time) Mass Spectrometry - A Preliminary Study. Accepted for Publication in the Journal of forensic Science on February 25, 2012. 16. LaPorte, G. & Stephens, J. Analysis Techniques Used for the Forensic Examination of Writing and Printing Inks in The Forensic Chemistry Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, 2012. DOJ-OGR-00007853",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 360 of 375 LaPorte CV (Version 2020.3) Page 7 of 19",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "5. Wagstaff, I. and LaPorte, G. The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Forensic Sciences. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://www.nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/importance-of-diversity-and-inclusion-in-forensic-sciences.aspx.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "6. LaPorte, G. Wrongful Convictions and DNA Exonerations: Understanding the Role of Forensic Science. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/wrongful-convictions-and-dna-exonerations.aspx.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "7. Waltke, H., LaPorte, G., Weiss, D., Schwarting, D., Nguyen, M. and Scott, F. Sexual Assault Cases: Exploring the Importance of Non-DNA Forensic Evidence. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/non-dna-evidence-in-sexual-assault-cases.aspx.",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "8. Dutton, G. LaPorte G., Wagstaff, I. and Spivak, Cultivating the Next Generation of Forensic Scientists Through Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Journal of Forensic Research 2017,8:4; DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.10000384. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/cultivating-the-next-generation-of-forensic-scientists-through-science technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-2157-7145-1000384.pdf",
  35. "position": "main"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "9. Gresham, K., LaPorte, G., Montgomery, B. and Weiss, D. Using Innovative Technology to Investigate Targeted Mass Violence: What the Future Holds (May 2017) http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/using-innovative-technology/#sthash.bPcOad34.dpuf.",
  40. "position": "main"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "10. Jones, N., & LaPorte, G. (Eds.) (2017). 2017 National Institute of Justice Forensic Science Research and Development Symposium. (RTI Press Publication No. CP-0004-1705). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. DOI: 10.3768/rtipress.2017.cp.0004.1705.",
  45. "position": "main"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "11. LaPorte, GM. (2015) Chemical analysis for the scientific examination of questioned documents, in Forensic Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications (ed J. A. Siegel), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781118897768.ch8.",
  50. "position": "main"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "12. Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence. Biological Evidence Preservation: Considerations for Policy Makers (April 2015) (http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2015/NIST.IR.8048.pdf).",
  55. "position": "main"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "13. Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook: Best Practice for Evidence Handlers. April 2013 (http://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/BiologicalEvidencePreservationHandbook.pdf)",
  60. "position": "main"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "14. Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. February, 2012 (http://nij.gov/pubs-sum/latent-print-human-factors.htm).",
  65. "position": "main"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "printed",
  69. "content": "15. Houlgrave, S., LaPorte, G., & Stephens, J. The Classification of Inkjet Inks Using AccuTOF TM DART TM (Direct Analysis in Real Time) Mass Spectrometry - A Preliminary Study. Accepted for Publication in the Journal of forensic Science on February 25, 2012.",
  70. "position": "main"
  71. },
  72. {
  73. "type": "printed",
  74. "content": "16. LaPorte, G. & Stephens, J. Analysis Techniques Used for the Forensic Examination of Writing and Printing Inks in The Forensic Chemistry Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.",
  75. "position": "main"
  76. },
  77. {
  78. "type": "stamp",
  79. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007853",
  80. "position": "footer"
  81. }
  82. ],
  83. "entities": {
  84. "people": [
  85. "Wagstaff, I.",
  86. "LaPorte, G.",
  87. "Waltke, H.",
  88. "Weiss, D.",
  89. "Schwarting, D.",
  90. "Nguyen, M.",
  91. "Scott, F.",
  92. "Dutton, G.",
  93. "Spivak",
  94. "Gresham, K.",
  95. "Montgomery, B.",
  96. "Jones, N.",
  97. "Siegel, J. A.",
  98. "Houlgrave, S.",
  99. "Stephens, J."
  100. ],
  101. "organizations": [
  102. "National Institute of Justice",
  103. "RTI Press",
  104. "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
  105. "U.S. Department of Commerce",
  106. "National Institute of Standards and Technology",
  107. "Journal of Forensic Research",
  108. "Omics Online"
  109. ],
  110. "locations": [
  111. "Research Triangle Park, NC",
  112. "Chichester, UK"
  113. ],
  114. "dates": [
  115. "September 2017",
  116. "2017",
  117. "May 2017",
  118. "2015",
  119. "April 2015",
  120. "April 2013",
  121. "February 2012",
  122. "February 25, 2012",
  123. "2012",
  124. "11/23/21"
  125. ],
  126. "reference_numbers": [
  127. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  128. "499-1",
  129. "279",
  130. "10.4172/2157-7145.10000384",
  131. "10.3768/rtipress.2017.cp.0004.1705",
  132. "10.1002/9781118897768.ch8",
  133. "DOJ-OGR-00007853"
  134. ]
  135. },
  136. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of references related to forensic science. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps other than the 'DOJ-OGR-00007853' at the bottom."
  137. }